Re: [security-dev] PicketLink AS Subsystem

I don't think that expose REST interfaces are a high priority at the moment (doable, but not a priority). But if you're interested in Anil and Pedro started something related, with the basics on picketlink-extensions (https://github.com/picketlink/picketlink-extensions/tree/master/core/src/...).

Currently I'm more concerned about the basics: HTTP basic & digest authentication + authorization on RESTful endpoints. -- "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato - @abstractj - Volenti Nihil Difficile On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Bolesław Dawidowicz wrote: > I would also like to discuss how independent PicketLink service should > be exposed and consumed in applications. Most natural way would be to > provide both CDI integration and REST interface. Any thoughts on that?