Re: [security-dev] PicketLink IDM JPA Identity Store
On 11/10/12 00:22, Douglas Campos wrote:
On Oct 9, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Shane Bryzak wrote:
> On 10/10/12 08:05, Douglas Campos wrote:
>> On Oct 9, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Shane Bryzak wrote:
>>
>>> If the goal is to make available a simple schema for just some
>>> developers that wanted it, the best way to do this is to provide an
>>> additional, optional jar file containing just the simple schema entity
>>> beans (call it picketlink-idm-defaultschema or something like this)
>>> rather than provide an entirely new implementation. This way we avoid
>>> the burden of having to maintain two implementations, and also avoid the
>>> aforementioned problem of having unwanted entity beans in the
>>> distribution for developers that don't want to use the simple schema.
>> So we go from complex to simple? Did you mean the opposite?
> I don't understand the question, sorry?
Optional jar file for the simple schema? shouldn't it be the opposite?
No no - the point I've been (seemingly unsuccessfully) trying to make is
that we *must not* include any entity beans by default. If we did it
would cause a multitude of problems for our users. If we do want to
provide a default schema that some of our users *may* elect to use
instead of providing their own, it must be in a separate jar file.