Re: [security-dev] PicketLink restructure

Shane, did you throw away the JPA code that Pedro had done for almost a month? Where is that code? Code contributions have legal ramifications. We cannot just throw away code and loss of history is deeply disturbing. Regards, Anil On 10/03/2012 05:39 PM, Shane Bryzak wrote: > There was a little bit of confusion over the legacy IDM code (I had > forgotten that it had been migrated to the picketlink-idm repo on > GitHub albeit under different branches) but this has been sorted out > now, and I believe all the history for it is intact. As for the > temporary IDM implementation we have the final snapshot of it, > however since then I've blown it away anyhow and started working on > the proper implementation. I don't think we need the history for the > temporary stuff. > > Agreed with the collective PL release. As for the version number, > did we ever do a 2.x release? If so, then I agree we should update > it to 3.x for the new project. > > Shane > > On 04/10/12 01:06, Anil Saldhana wrote: >> Shane, >> ahh. You could not wait a day or two. :) I am wondering if we >> could have retained history via some form of "git mv". >> >> We should probably have PicketLink version as 3.0 for all the code >> and rather than do individual releases, we can do a collective PL3.x >> release. >> >> Cheers. >> >> On 10/02/2012 04:56 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz wrote: >>> I restored our branches and synced with Shane on IM. >>> >>> picketlink-idm/master will be nuked and only contain some README >>> pointing to new locations >>> >>> Current picketlink-idm repo will be kept for few more months at >>> least and after we are in more calm situation with GateIn/EPP it >>> will be renamed into picketlink-idm-legacy. >>> >>> Things under control :) >>> >>> Bolek >>> >>> On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz >>> <bdawidow(a)redhat.com <mailto:bdawidow@redhat.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> I must say I'm quite pissed off... even yesterday I shared a link >>>> to one of configuration files in 1.4 branch with a consultants. We >>>> released twice last month... how could have it happened without >>>> any question? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz >>>> <bdawidow(a)redhat.com <mailto:bdawidow@redhat.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Have you just removed picketlink-idm on github? >>>>> >>>>> We are actively working on 1.4 branch and this is critical for >>>>> EPP. Other branches are still maintenance for older versions of >>>>> GateIn/EPP. I think I was fairly clear that we need those. >>>>> >>>>> This repo needs to be restored ASAP. >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 2, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com >>>>> <mailto:sbryzak@redhat.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In the interests of presenting a clear message to our >>>>>> developers, one of the steps we'll be taking is to consolidate >>>>>> the various PicketLink projects into a single project and >>>>>> presenting this as the "go to" solution for application >>>>>> security. For now I've merged the CDI and IDM subprojects (these >>>>>> are now submodules of the PicketLink project, with "CDI" renamed >>>>>> to "Core") and the plan is to eventually merge the social and >>>>>> federation modules also. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can find the new GitHub repository here: >>>>>> https://github.com/picketlink (renamed from picketlink-cdi) and >>>>>> the picketlink-idm repository has now been deleted. For anyone >>>>>> working on these modules, please use the new repository from now on. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> Shane >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> security-dev mailing list >> security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > security-dev mailing list > security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev _______________________________________________ security-dev mailing list security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev