Nope, the demo made use of PicketLink extensions in the past. Now the purpose is to use PicketLink only, digging into the sources, I can't see any good reasons to use PicketLink extensions.


-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

On Saturday, February 9, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:

Nice. Your aerogear-security module is a good way to abstract implementations/security providers. The demo is using picketlink-extensions impl, right (aerogear-security-picketbox) ?

Regards.
Pedro Igor

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno@abstractj.org>
To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva@redhat.com>
Cc: security-dev@lists.jboss.org
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2013 8:41:58 PM
Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink IDM] - Timed Release 3.0.0-2013Feb08


Hi Pedro,


Shane helped me this week to get our demo working, if you want to take a sneak peak http://controller-abstractj.rhcloud.com/aerogear-controller-demo/


Sources at: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-controller-demo and switched to the latest timed releases.


I'll work on the next week testing HTTP digest/LDAP authentication.




--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

On Friday, February 8, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:




Hi,


Today, we released a new timed version for the PicketLink IDM project. The documentation and quickstarts are being elaborated, but you can always check the test cases for a lot of usage examples.


<dependency>
<groupId>org.picketlink</groupId>
<artifactId>picketlink-idm-impl</artifactId>
<version>3.0.0-2013Feb08</version>
</dependency>


This version contains the changes required to support the last discussion regarding groups with the same name and group's path.


https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-89


Regards.
Pedro Igor
_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev