Nope, +1

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak@redhat.com> wrote:
Hey guys,

I'm just looking at the infrastructure we have for doing this, currently in the PicketLink github repo [1] we have picketlink-idm and cdi repositories set up.  I propose that we rename picketlink-idm to picketlink-idm-legacy to make way for the new picketlink-idm, and rename cdi to picketlink-cdi (this module will then contain all the CDI and DeltaSpike integration for PicketLink IDM, plus some authorization features such as ACLs and permission management).  Are there any objections to this?

Shane

[1] https://github.com/picketlink

_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev




--
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp

Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling

PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu