Re: [security-dev] PicketLink3 and Apache Deltaspike Dependencies

Is there anything in v0.4 you need, or can you simply get by with v0.3 Sent from my iPhone On Feb 14, 2013, at 17:29, Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Scratch this plan. Shane and I determined that this is larger than we > originally thought -> lots of DS classes need to be forked. > > > On 02/13/2013 10:25 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote: >> Hi all, >> PicketLink3 is on the final stretch of release cycles. One of the >> concerns I have had is the Apache Deltaspike dependency which is some >> type of incubating snapshot. Since there are very few Deltaspike classes >> (3-5 in number) that we depend on, the following strategy should work: >> - Copy the source files (Retaining Apache Headers) as it is from Apache >> Deltaspike to a PicketLink namespace such as : org.picketlink.deltaspike.* >> - Remove the Apache Deltaspike dependency. >> >> In few months, when Apache Deltaspike has proper releases, we can remove >> the PicketLink Deltaspike forked classes and bring back the Apache >> Deltaspike dependency back. I do not think PicketLink users will >> directly code to DS classes. >> >> I ran this with Pete Muir, Shane and Jason Porter and they all agreed >> that this is a good strategy (I did refine the strategy based on Shane's >> comments). >> >> Regards, >> Anil > _______________________________________________ > security-dev mailing list > security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev _______________________________________________ security-dev mailing list security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev