Re: [security-dev] JPA?

But for Wildfly core authentication using PicketLink IDM, for database backends, JDBC makes sense.

It wasn't a tangent discussion, Jason asked, "do we have to depend on JPA?" You guys inferred that to do this application model sharing you're talking about, JPA is required... On 6/11/2013 7:24 PM, Shane Bryzak wrote: > On 12/06/13 09:15, Bill Burke wrote: >> I thought what we were discussing here is removing the dependency on JPA >> for the RDBMS backend plugin when deploying picketlink to Wildfly? >> >> > That's how the thread started, but then it veered into a discussion > about what application developers care about. > > On 06/11/2013 03:53 PM, Bill Burke wrote: > >> JPA vs. JDBC isn't a choice, users won't care. Why would app developers >> care either? They should be using management interfaces or the upcoming >> sso server to manage their domains. > From your perspective, this might be sufficient to meet your own > requirements however Anil and the security team have to look at the > bigger picture. Not every developer is going to use PicketLink in the > exact same way. > > _______________________________________________ > security-dev mailing list > security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev >