A REST interface is orthogonal, IMO. For instance, you could have a
Java facade over your REST interface, then, your application code
doesn't even know if it is going remote or not to interact with the IDM.
On 2/19/2013 10:00 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
The subsystem will be critical for AS8 Security. So we need to have
a wider
discussion on the subsystem design. At a bare minimum, we need a PL
subsystem that exposes the IDM.
On 02/19/2013 05:13 AM, Bolesław Dawidowicz wrote:
> Hi
>
> We are doing some prototyping with PicketBox and PicketLink 3. As part
> of this it makes sense for use to put it in separate subystem in AS7.
>
> There is existing PicketLink 2.x one here:
>
>
https://github.com/picketlink/as-subsystem
>
> From what I learned from Anil while it is on the roadmap PicketLink 3.x
> subsystem won't happens soon. I would like to discus requirements for it
> as we may be able to contribute something - at least some initial work.
>
> I would also like to discuss how independent PicketLink service should
> be exposed and consumed in applications. Most natural way would be to
> provide both CDI integration and REST interface. Any thoughts on that?
>
> As part of our prototyping we would like to avoid investing time into
> something that would duplicate existing functionality or go against
> already agreed design.
>
> Bolek
_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com