6:58 a.m.
There's a few issues with managing credentials. The first is, there is
no way to remove a credential. This is essential to TOTP as you may end
up with a lost or obsolete device.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-236
THe 2nd is that for TOTP, you will want to check every device on a
credential validation rather than just one:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-237
Our own VPN allows me to set up multiple tokens. I have one on my
iphone and ipad just in case I lose one or the other. OUr VPN allows me
to use either to login in.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
5:19 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:58:27 AM
Subject: [security-dev] managing OTP
There's a few issues with managing credentials. The first is, there is
no way to remove a credential. This is essential to TOTP as you may end
up with a lost or obsolete device.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-236
I missed that too and have discussed that with Shane a long time ago. The idea is to have
a history of all account's credentials.
If a devices becomes obsolete, you just set expiration date.
THe 2nd is that for TOTP, you will want to check every device on a
credential validation rather than just one:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-237
Our own VPN allows me to set up multiple tokens. I have one on my
iphone and ipad just in case I lose one or the other. OUr VPN allows me
to use either to login in.
Is not a valid option you iterate over user's devices and try each one ?
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
8:20 a.m.
On 8/12/2013 6:19 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:58:27 AM
> Subject: [security-dev] managing OTP
>
> There's a few issues with managing credentials. The first is, there is
> no way to remove a credential. This is essential to TOTP as you may end
> up with a lost or obsolete device.
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-236
>
I missed that too and have discussed that with Shane a long time ago. The idea is to have
a history of all account's credentials.
The reason for this is?
If a devices becomes obsolete, you just set expiration date.
Its not just TOTP, same with password. Every time a user has a lost
password two new obsolete ones are added to the database: temporary
one, then a password change. Maybe not such a big deal with a few
users, but when you get to tens, hundreds of thousands of users, won't
this kind of be a problem?
> THe 2nd is that for TOTP, you will want to check every device on
a
> credential validation rather than just one:
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-237
>
> Our own VPN allows me to set up multiple tokens. I have one on my
> iphone and ipad just in case I lose one or the other. OUr VPN allows me
> to use either to login in.
>
Is not a valid option you iterate over user's devices and try each one ?
Sure, this is why this is an enhancement.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
8:23 a.m.
On 08/12/2013 08:20 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
On 8/12/2013 6:19 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:58:27 AM
>> Subject: [security-dev] managing OTP
>>
>> There's a few issues with managing credentials. The first is, there is
>> no way to remove a credential. This is essential to TOTP as you may end
>> up with a lost or obsolete device.
>>
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-236
>>
> I missed that too and have discussed that with Shane a long time ago. The idea is to
have a history of all account's credentials.
>
The reason for this is?
> If a devices becomes obsolete, you just set expiration date.
>
Its not just TOTP, same with password. Every time a user has a lost
password two new obsolete ones are added to the database: temporary
one, then a password change. Maybe not such a big deal with a few
users, but when you get to tens, hundreds of thousands of users, won't
this kind of be a problem?
There will be thousands of users for PicketLink IDM. As
Bolek can
attest, PL 1.x IDM had that usage.
Pedro, lets review this password/credential issue.
>> THe 2nd is that for TOTP, you will want to check every device
on a
>> credential validation rather than just one:
>>
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-237
>>
>> Our own VPN allows me to set up multiple tokens. I have one on my
>> iphone and ipad just in case I lose one or the other. OUr VPN allows me
>> to use either to login in.
>>
> Is not a valid option you iterate over user's devices and try each one ?
>
Sure, this is why this is an enhancement.
8:38 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>
To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 10:23:07 AM
Subject: Re: [security-dev] managing OTP
On 08/12/2013 08:20 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>
> On 8/12/2013 6:19 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:58:27 AM
>>> Subject: [security-dev] managing OTP
>>>
>>> There's a few issues with managing credentials. The first is, there is
>>> no way to remove a credential. This is essential to TOTP as you may end
>>> up with a lost or obsolete device.
>>>
>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-236
>>>
>> I missed that too and have discussed that with Shane a long time ago. The
>> idea is to have a history of all account's credentials.
>>
> The reason for this is?
>
>> If a devices becomes obsolete, you just set expiration date.
>>
> Its not just TOTP, same with password. Every time a user has a lost
> password two new obsolete ones are added to the database: temporary
> one, then a password change. Maybe not such a big deal with a few
> users, but when you get to tens, hundreds of thousands of users, won't
> this kind of be a problem?
There will be thousands of users for PicketLink IDM. As Bolek can
attest, PL 1.x IDM had that usage.
Pedro, lets review this password/credential issue.
Let's do this.
>>> THe 2nd is that for TOTP, you will want to check every
device on a
>>> credential validation rather than just one:
>>>
>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-237
>>>
>>> Our own VPN allows me to set up multiple tokens. I have one on my
>>> iphone and ipad just in case I lose one or the other. OUr VPN allows me
>>> to use either to login in.
>>>
>> Is not a valid option you iterate over user's devices and try each one ?
>>
> Sure, this is why this is an enhancement.
>
_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
11:18 a.m.
On Aug 12, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>
> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 10:23:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [security-dev] managing OTP
>
> On 08/12/2013 08:20 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>
>> On 8/12/2013 6:19 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>>>> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:58:27 AM
>>>> Subject: [security-dev] managing OTP
>>>>
>>>> There's a few issues with managing credentials. The first is, there
is
>>>> no way to remove a credential. This is essential to TOTP as you may end
>>>> up with a lost or obsolete device.
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-236
>>>>
>>> I missed that too and have discussed that with Shane a long time ago. The
>>> idea is to have a history of all account's credentials.
>>>
>> The reason for this is?
>>
>>> If a devices becomes obsolete, you just set expiration date.
>>>
>> Its not just TOTP, same with password. Every time a user has a lost
>> password two new obsolete ones are added to the database: temporary
>> one, then a password change. Maybe not such a big deal with a few
>> users, but when you get to tens, hundreds of thousands of users, won't
>> this kind of be a problem?
> There will be thousands of users for PicketLink IDM. As Bolek can
> attest, PL 1.x IDM had that usage.
> Pedro, lets review this password/credential issue.
>
Let's do this.
Please don't think thousands. It will show nothing :) It is a good exercise to make to
feed your storage with 1M users, 200k of groups and/or roles, define membership and etc.
Set at least 20 attributes for each user. Perform some operations - like mentioned setting
credentials. Make sure to perform various types of queries. This is the level at which
your SSD, 8GB of RAM and quad core CPU can't fake you anymore.
Relatively quick and simple to setup on your laptop but quite good to identify weak spots
in storage implementation. This is also fairly true scenario. Enterprise class customer
can easily have that number of external users. Bigger organisation will have crazy amount
of groups in LDAP and you may need to sync all of them into DB. Also with so flexible
schema developers will abuse it by mapping all possible permission types to big set of
roles - even if you could do it more efficient in different way. Sadly you cannot ban
wrong usage of your model ;)
As you are currently discussing JDBC storage I would suggest implementing such tests
early. Outcome can easily lead you to complete redesign of your storage implementation.
Also it matters to measure time of certain operations and see how they scale depending on
numbers of users. This can also help to identify leaks like the one pointed by Bill. Also
my personal assumption is that with so flexible implementation like you have with JPA you
won't be able to maintain scalability easily. It is better to verify. It took me and
Marek a lot of time and careful fine tuning to make it perform for JPP and it didn't
happen without tradeoffs.
This is the PL IDM 1.x experience to share :)
>>>> THe 2nd is that for TOTP, you will want to check every device on a
>>>> credential validation rather than just one:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-237
>>>>
>>>> Our own VPN allows me to set up multiple tokens. I have one on my
>>>> iphone and ipad just in case I lose one or the other. OUr VPN allows me
>>>> to use either to login in.
>>>>
>>> Is not a valid option you iterate over user's devices and try each one ?
>>>
>> Sure, this is why this is an enhancement.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>
_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
11:27 a.m.
On Aug 12, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Aug 12, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>
>> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 10:23:07 AM
>> Subject: Re: [security-dev] managing OTP
>>
>> On 08/12/2013 08:20 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/12/2013 6:19 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:58:27 AM
>>>>> Subject: [security-dev] managing OTP
>>>>>
>>>>> There's a few issues with managing credentials. The first is,
there is
>>>>> no way to remove a credential. This is essential to TOTP as you may
end
>>>>> up with a lost or obsolete device.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-236
>>>> I missed that too and have discussed that with Shane a long time ago.
The
>>>> idea is to have a history of all account's credentials.
>>> The reason for this is?
>>>
>>>> If a devices becomes obsolete, you just set expiration date.
>>> Its not just TOTP, same with password. Every time a user has a lost
>>> password two new obsolete ones are added to the database: temporary
>>> one, then a password change. Maybe not such a big deal with a few
>>> users, but when you get to tens, hundreds of thousands of users, won't
>>> this kind of be a problem?
>> There will be thousands of users for PicketLink IDM. As Bolek can
>> attest, PL 1.x IDM had that usage.
>> Pedro, lets review this password/credential issue.
>
> Let's do this.
Please don't think thousands. It will show nothing :) It is a good exercise to make
to feed your storage with 1M users, 200k of groups and/or roles, define membership and
etc. Set at least 20 attributes for each user. Perform some operations - like mentioned
setting credentials. Make sure to perform various types of queries. This is the level at
which your SSD, 8GB of RAM and quad core CPU can't fake you anymore.
Relatively quick and simple to setup on your laptop but quite good to identify weak spots
in storage implementation. This is also fairly true scenario. Enterprise class customer
can easily have that number of external users. Bigger organisation will have crazy amount
of groups in LDAP and you may need to sync all of them into DB. Also with so flexible
schema developers will abuse it by mapping all possible permission types to big set of
roles - even if you could do it more efficient in different way. Sadly you cannot ban
wrong usage of your model ;)
As you are currently discussing JDBC storage I would suggest implementing such tests
early. Outcome can easily lead you to complete redesign of your storage implementation.
Also it matters to measure time of certain operations and see how they scale depending on
numbers of users. This can also help to identify leaks like the one pointed by Bill. Also
my personal assumption is that with so flexible implementation like you have with JPA you
won't be able to maintain scalability easily. It is better to verify. It took me and
Marek a lot of time and careful fine tuning to make it perform for JPP and it didn't
happen without tradeoffs.
This is the PL IDM 1.x experience to share :)
Bolek - thanks for the excellent feedback. This morning Marek, Pedro, Peter and I were
discussing testing similar to what you did with 1.x
We appreciate the excellent support from Marek and you to get the IDM model optimal.
>
>>>>> THe 2nd is that for TOTP, you will want to check every device on a
>>>>> credential validation rather than just one:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-237
>>>>>
>>>>> Our own VPN allows me to set up multiple tokens. I have one on my
>>>>> iphone and ipad just in case I lose one or the other. OUr VPN allows
me
>>>>> to use either to login in.
>>>> Is not a valid option you iterate over user's devices and try each
one ?
>>> Sure, this is why this is an enhancement.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> security-dev mailing list
>> security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
4:43 p.m.
Hi Bolek,
Do you have any reference from where I can get the PL-IDM 1.x performance metrics and
numbers ?
Wondering if we can use them as a goal when running 2.5 tests.
Thanks.
Pedro Igor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boleslaw Dawidowicz" <bdawidow(a)redhat.com>
To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>,
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:18:44 PM
Subject: Re: [security-dev] managing OTP
On Aug 12, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>
> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 10:23:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [security-dev] managing OTP
>
> On 08/12/2013 08:20 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>
>> On 8/12/2013 6:19 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>>>> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:58:27 AM
>>>> Subject: [security-dev] managing OTP
>>>>
>>>> There's a few issues with managing credentials. The first is, there
is
>>>> no way to remove a credential. This is essential to TOTP as you may end
>>>> up with a lost or obsolete device.
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-236
>>>>
>>> I missed that too and have discussed that with Shane a long time ago. The
>>> idea is to have a history of all account's credentials.
>>>
>> The reason for this is?
>>
>>> If a devices becomes obsolete, you just set expiration date.
>>>
>> Its not just TOTP, same with password. Every time a user has a lost
>> password two new obsolete ones are added to the database: temporary
>> one, then a password change. Maybe not such a big deal with a few
>> users, but when you get to tens, hundreds of thousands of users, won't
>> this kind of be a problem?
> There will be thousands of users for PicketLink IDM. As Bolek can
> attest, PL 1.x IDM had that usage.
> Pedro, lets review this password/credential issue.
>
Let's do this.
Please don't think thousands. It will show nothing :) It is a good exercise to make to
feed your storage with 1M users, 200k of groups and/or roles, define membership and etc.
Set at least 20 attributes for each user. Perform some operations - like mentioned setting
credentials. Make sure to perform various types of queries. This is the level at which
your SSD, 8GB of RAM and quad core CPU can't fake you anymore.
Relatively quick and simple to setup on your laptop but quite good to identify weak spots
in storage implementation. This is also fairly true scenario. Enterprise class customer
can easily have that number of external users. Bigger organisation will have crazy amount
of groups in LDAP and you may need to sync all of them into DB. Also with so flexible
schema developers will abuse it by mapping all possible permission types to big set of
roles - even if you could do it more efficient in different way. Sadly you cannot ban
wrong usage of your model ;)
As you are currently discussing JDBC storage I would suggest implementing such tests
early. Outcome can easily lead you to complete redesign of your storage implementation.
Also it matters to measure time of certain operations and see how they scale depending on
numbers of users. This can also help to identify leaks like the one pointed by Bill. Also
my personal assumption is that with so flexible implementation like you have with JPA you
won't be able to maintain scalability easily. It is better to verify. It took me and
Marek a lot of time and careful fine tuning to make it perform for JPP and it didn't
happen without tradeoffs.
This is the PL IDM 1.x experience to share :)
>>>> THe 2nd is that for TOTP, you will want to check every device on a
>>>> credential validation rather than just one:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-237
>>>>
>>>> Our own VPN allows me to set up multiple tokens. I have one on my
>>>> iphone and ipad just in case I lose one or the other. OUr VPN allows me
>>>> to use either to login in.
>>>>
>>> Is not a valid option you iterate over user's devices and try each one ?
>>>
>> Sure, this is why this is an enhancement.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>
_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
5:55 p.m.
Sadly we never did it fully for IDM alone - only for portal as a whole. We were also not
measuring particular IDM operations - rather optimising on portal usage. Additionally we
tuned a lot with 4 levels of cache altogether - hibernate, identity store, IDM API, portal
API. Plus some additional workarounds for corner cases. Not really something to compare
against :/
I think for web application acceptable page load time is around 2s. Then 4-5s is probably
worst case scenario nowadays. For certain rare administrative tasks you can accept 10-20s.
For first page load after app boot it can be a bit more as you need to populate cache.
Still even for enterprise class app with huge store having 8s for first time load is a max
IMO. IDM layer needs to make it achievable taking into account that web app will add a bit
of it's own overhead on top. If you test with proposed large store and are safely
below those numbers I think it is enough initially.
Just to give example why I suggested such number of users. IDM 1.x has single table for
attributes related to any identity type. With 1M users and 20 attributes each you end up
with 20M rows. Plus groups… You can then easily identify any wrong join you make. Even
just playing with simple CRUD demo app.
Few things that I recall about most important operations to check
- User creation - checking uniqueness can be costly - especially with common requirement
to check unique email separately to username.
- Authentication
- Authorisation check of given user based on group/role membership
- Queries with attribute filters and pagination - typical for management console
- Queries based on role membership (plus filters and pagination) - same
Those are tricky with more complex schema but still achievable with some adjustments and
SQL/HQL profiling.
Most of fun is really with LDAP and if you mix it with DB. Few things are easier to
achieve in efficient manner. For example attribute filters are fast by design - not like
joins. Some are not doable at all - like paginated query based on membership and filtered
by attribute value. Some LDAP servers don't support all controls useful in such
scenarios. However real fun is when you have part of data in DB and part in LDAP and need
to merge it. This is a dead end - you can still workaround and optimize for few scenarios
but nothing more.
I wrote it few times here already - If I was implementing it again I wouldn't do
identity store federation at all. If LDAP store is not enough and you need to have
additional data in DB - just sync everything there. This is doable in efficient manner
using LDAP changelog feature which stores information to data change the delta since last
sync.
This is another suggestion from me :) Don't underestimate possible issues with LDAP
store performance. You can do exactly the same as with DB. It is even simpler… I was
generating huge LDAP store with really dumb bash script writing into ldif file to import.
But this is another topic… and you should focus on optimising for typical MSAD windows
domain schema as that is 95% of LDAP stores around :)
On Aug 12, 2013, at 11:43 PM, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Bolek,
Do you have any reference from where I can get the PL-IDM 1.x performance metrics and
numbers ?
Wondering if we can use them as a goal when running 2.5 tests.
Thanks.
Pedro Igor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boleslaw Dawidowicz" <bdawidow(a)redhat.com>
To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>,
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:18:44 PM
Subject: Re: [security-dev] managing OTP
On Aug 12, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>
>> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 10:23:07 AM
>> Subject: Re: [security-dev] managing OTP
>>
>> On 08/12/2013 08:20 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/12/2013 6:19 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:58:27 AM
>>>>> Subject: [security-dev] managing OTP
>>>>>
>>>>> There's a few issues with managing credentials. The first is,
there is
>>>>> no way to remove a credential. This is essential to TOTP as you may
end
>>>>> up with a lost or obsolete device.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-236
>>>>>
>>>> I missed that too and have discussed that with Shane a long time ago.
The
>>>> idea is to have a history of all account's credentials.
>>>>
>>> The reason for this is?
>>>
>>>> If a devices becomes obsolete, you just set expiration date.
>>>>
>>> Its not just TOTP, same with password. Every time a user has a lost
>>> password two new obsolete ones are added to the database: temporary
>>> one, then a password change. Maybe not such a big deal with a few
>>> users, but when you get to tens, hundreds of thousands of users, won't
>>> this kind of be a problem?
>> There will be thousands of users for PicketLink IDM. As Bolek can
>> attest, PL 1.x IDM had that usage.
>> Pedro, lets review this password/credential issue.
>>
>
> Let's do this.
Please don't think thousands. It will show nothing :) It is a good exercise to make
to feed your storage with 1M users, 200k of groups and/or roles, define membership and
etc. Set at least 20 attributes for each user. Perform some operations - like mentioned
setting credentials. Make sure to perform various types of queries. This is the level at
which your SSD, 8GB of RAM and quad core CPU can't fake you anymore.
Relatively quick and simple to setup on your laptop but quite good to identify weak spots
in storage implementation. This is also fairly true scenario. Enterprise class customer
can easily have that number of external users. Bigger organisation will have crazy amount
of groups in LDAP and you may need to sync all of them into DB. Also with so flexible
schema developers will abuse it by mapping all possible permission types to big set of
roles - even if you could do it more efficient in different way. Sadly you cannot ban
wrong usage of your model ;)
As you are currently discussing JDBC storage I would suggest implementing such tests
early. Outcome can easily lead you to complete redesign of your storage implementation.
Also it matters to measure time of certain operations and see how they scale depending on
numbers of users. This can also help to identify leaks like the one pointed by Bill. Also
my personal assumption is that with so flexible implementation like you have with JPA you
won't be able to maintain scalability easily. It is better to verify. It took me and
Marek a lot of time and careful fine tuning to make it perform for JPP and it didn't
happen without tradeoffs.
This is the PL IDM 1.x experience to share :)
>
>>>>> THe 2nd is that for TOTP, you will want to check every device on a
>>>>> credential validation rather than just one:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-237
>>>>>
>>>>> Our own VPN allows me to set up multiple tokens. I have one on my
>>>>> iphone and ipad just in case I lose one or the other. OUr VPN allows
me
>>>>> to use either to login in.
>>>>>
>>>> Is not a valid option you iterate over user's devices and try each
one ?
>>>>
>>> Sure, this is why this is an enhancement.
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> security-dev mailing list
>> security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
6:21 p.m.
Wow, that is a lot of experience :) Thanks, I'm sure we need to consider all this
knowledge.
I understand your thoughts about the store federation issue you mentioned. Actually, I
think is how most IDM solutions work. Everything is pushed and pulled from a single store.
With some built-in connectors for each repository.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boleslaw Dawidowicz" <bdawidow(a)redhat.com>
To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>,
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 7:55:46 PM
Subject: Re: [security-dev] managing OTP
Sadly we never did it fully for IDM alone - only for portal as a whole. We were also not
measuring particular IDM operations - rather optimising on portal usage. Additionally we
tuned a lot with 4 levels of cache altogether - hibernate, identity store, IDM API, portal
API. Plus some additional workarounds for corner cases. Not really something to compare
against :/
I think for web application acceptable page load time is around 2s. Then 4-5s is probably
worst case scenario nowadays. For certain rare administrative tasks you can accept 10-20s.
For first page load after app boot it can be a bit more as you need to populate cache.
Still even for enterprise class app with huge store having 8s for first time load is a max
IMO. IDM layer needs to make it achievable taking into account that web app will add a bit
of it's own overhead on top. If you test with proposed large store and are safely
below those numbers I think it is enough initially.
Just to give example why I suggested such number of users. IDM 1.x has single table for
attributes related to any identity type. With 1M users and 20 attributes each you end up
with 20M rows. Plus groups… You can then easily identify any wrong join you make. Even
just playing with simple CRUD demo app.
Few things that I recall about most important operations to check
- User creation - checking uniqueness can be costly - especially with common requirement
to check unique email separately to username.
- Authentication
- Authorisation check of given user based on group/role membership
- Queries with attribute filters and pagination - typical for management console
- Queries based on role membership (plus filters and pagination) - same
Those are tricky with more complex schema but still achievable with some adjustments and
SQL/HQL profiling.
Most of fun is really with LDAP and if you mix it with DB. Few things are easier to
achieve in efficient manner. For example attribute filters are fast by design - not like
joins. Some are not doable at all - like paginated query based on membership and filtered
by attribute value. Some LDAP servers don't support all controls useful in such
scenarios. However real fun is when you have part of data in DB and part in LDAP and need
to merge it. This is a dead end - you can still workaround and optimize for few scenarios
but nothing more.
I wrote it few times here already - If I was implementing it again I wouldn't do
identity store federation at all. If LDAP store is not enough and you need to have
additional data in DB - just sync everything there. This is doable in efficient manner
using LDAP changelog feature which stores information to data change the delta since last
sync.
This is another suggestion from me :) Don't underestimate possible issues with LDAP
store performance. You can do exactly the same as with DB. It is even simpler… I was
generating huge LDAP store with really dumb bash script writing into ldif file to import.
But this is another topic… and you should focus on optimising for typical MSAD windows
domain schema as that is 95% of LDAP stores around :)
On Aug 12, 2013, at 11:43 PM, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Bolek,
Do you have any reference from where I can get the PL-IDM 1.x performance metrics and
numbers ?
Wondering if we can use them as a goal when running 2.5 tests.
Thanks.
Pedro Igor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boleslaw Dawidowicz" <bdawidow(a)redhat.com>
To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>,
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:18:44 PM
Subject: Re: [security-dev] managing OTP
On Aug 12, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>
>> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 10:23:07 AM
>> Subject: Re: [security-dev] managing OTP
>>
>> On 08/12/2013 08:20 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/12/2013 6:19 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:58:27 AM
>>>>> Subject: [security-dev] managing OTP
>>>>>
>>>>> There's a few issues with managing credentials. The first is,
there is
>>>>> no way to remove a credential. This is essential to TOTP as you may
end
>>>>> up with a lost or obsolete device.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-236
>>>>>
>>>> I missed that too and have discussed that with Shane a long time ago.
The
>>>> idea is to have a history of all account's credentials.
>>>>
>>> The reason for this is?
>>>
>>>> If a devices becomes obsolete, you just set expiration date.
>>>>
>>> Its not just TOTP, same with password. Every time a user has a lost
>>> password two new obsolete ones are added to the database: temporary
>>> one, then a password change. Maybe not such a big deal with a few
>>> users, but when you get to tens, hundreds of thousands of users, won't
>>> this kind of be a problem?
>> There will be thousands of users for PicketLink IDM. As Bolek can
>> attest, PL 1.x IDM had that usage.
>> Pedro, lets review this password/credential issue.
>>
>
> Let's do this.
Please don't think thousands. It will show nothing :) It is a good exercise to make
to feed your storage with 1M users, 200k of groups and/or roles, define membership and
etc. Set at least 20 attributes for each user. Perform some operations - like mentioned
setting credentials. Make sure to perform various types of queries. This is the level at
which your SSD, 8GB of RAM and quad core CPU can't fake you anymore.
Relatively quick and simple to setup on your laptop but quite good to identify weak spots
in storage implementation. This is also fairly true scenario. Enterprise class customer
can easily have that number of external users. Bigger organisation will have crazy amount
of groups in LDAP and you may need to sync all of them into DB. Also with so flexible
schema developers will abuse it by mapping all possible permission types to big set of
roles - even if you could do it more efficient in different way. Sadly you cannot ban
wrong usage of your model ;)
As you are currently discussing JDBC storage I would suggest implementing such tests
early. Outcome can easily lead you to complete redesign of your storage implementation.
Also it matters to measure time of certain operations and see how they scale depending on
numbers of users. This can also help to identify leaks like the one pointed by Bill. Also
my personal assumption is that with so flexible implementation like you have with JPA you
won't be able to maintain scalability easily. It is better to verify. It took me and
Marek a lot of time and careful fine tuning to make it perform for JPP and it didn't
happen without tradeoffs.
This is the PL IDM 1.x experience to share :)
>
>>>>> THe 2nd is that for TOTP, you will want to check every device on a
>>>>> credential validation rather than just one:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-237
>>>>>
>>>>> Our own VPN allows me to set up multiple tokens. I have one on my
>>>>> iphone and ipad just in case I lose one or the other. OUr VPN allows
me
>>>>> to use either to login in.
>>>>>
>>>> Is not a valid option you iterate over user's devices and try each
one ?
>>>>
>>> Sure, this is why this is an enhancement.
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> security-dev mailing list
>> security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
9:31 p.m.
On 08/12/2013 08:38 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>
> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 10:23:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [security-dev] managing OTP
>
> On 08/12/2013 08:20 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>> On 8/12/2013 6:19 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>>>> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:58:27 AM
>>>> Subject: [security-dev] managing OTP
>>>>
>>>> There's a few issues with managing credentials. The first is, there
is
>>>> no way to remove a credential. This is essential to TOTP as you may end
>>>> up with a lost or obsolete device.
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-236
>>>>
>>> I missed that too and have discussed that with Shane a long time ago. The
>>> idea is to have a history of all account's credentials.
>>>
>> The reason for this is?
>>
>>> If a devices becomes obsolete, you just set expiration date.
>>>
>> Its not just TOTP, same with password. Every time a user has a lost
>> password two new obsolete ones are added to the database: temporary
>> one, then a password change. Maybe not such a big deal with a few
>> users, but when you get to tens, hundreds of thousands of users, won't
>> this kind of be a problem?
> There will be thousands of users for PicketLink IDM. As Bolek can
> attest, PL 1.x IDM had that usage.
> Pedro, lets review this password/credential issue.
>
Let's do this.
During discussion this morning, we thought of the following:
configurable history of passwords (0, 1, 10,20 to all).
>>>> THe 2nd is that for TOTP, you will want to check every device on a
>>>> credential validation rather than just one:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK-237
>>>>
>>>> Our own VPN allows me to set up multiple tokens. I have one on my
>>>> iphone and ipad just in case I lose one or the other. OUr VPN allows me
>>>> to use either to login in.
>>>>
>>> Is not a valid option you iterate over user's devices and try each one ?
>>>
>> Sure, this is why this is an enhancement.
>>
>>
3937
days inactive
3939
days old
10 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Anil Saldhana -
Anil Saldhana -
Bill Burke -
Boleslaw Dawidowicz -
Pedro Igor Silva