Pedro/Stian,
it should be fine to release beta of the subsystem.
Regards,
Anil
On 05/02/2013 08:22 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
Good suggestions. Regarding the release, going to talk with Anil and
see what he is planning.
Thanks.
Pedro Igor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
Cc: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 9:42:31 AM
Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft
The installer looks good. Two minor suggestions:
* Instead of "config/lib" have
"modules/system/layers/base/org/picketlink" - to easier allow updating the
modules manually without the installer (e.g. "unzip -o -d $JBOSS_HOME
picketlink-inst.zip modules")
* Make it possible to specify "jboss.as.dist.dir" as a system property - to
allow automated updates
Are you planning a beta release of the subsystem soon?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, 2 May, 2013 11:15:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 6:32:21 AM
>> Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft
>>
>> Looks good.
>>
>> One thing that's missing is how to use the identity manager configured in
>> the
>> domain model with PicketLink Core. Has this issue been resolved yet?
>>
> I'm going to add the usage of the PicketLink Core to the docs.
>
>> Also, it would be good if there was a zip containing all the modules
>> available in Maven and also included in the download of PicketLink. This
>> would make it simpler to install the sub-system until it's available in
>> WildFly, and after that it would make it easy to upgrade the version if
>> users wants to experiment with new features.
>>
> +1, for that. We already have something similiar with PicketLink v2 [1].
> Maybe we can use the same solution ? What do you think ?
>
> References:
> [1]
>
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/Installation#Installation-Pic...
>
>> Cheers,
>> Stian
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Monday, 29 April, 2013 6:53:16 PM
>>> Subject: [security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Would like to share the documentation for the PicketLink Subsystem
>>> with
>>> some information about what was done so far.
>>>
>>>
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/PicketLink+Subsystem
>>>
>>> For now, we're only covering the IDM configuration. But we want to
>>> provide some info about the PicketLink Core and Federation usage.
>>> Actually, for Federation we already have some documentation (need to
>>> review):
>>>
>>>
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/PicketLink+AS7+Subsystem
>>>
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/Management+Console
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> Pedro Igor