7:52 p.m.
Shane,
recently I merged in the social login code under "social". This is
plain vanilla code for login using facebook and google. I need to move
some code for twitter login.
Next we are going to move the federation code under "federation". This
will provide the SAML object model/parsing/writing.
Since I have OAuth2 implementation, I am wondering whether I should just
merge into social or keep a separate module called "oauth". I am leaning
toward the latter.
Regards,
Anil
3:08 a.m.
On 10/25/2012 03:52 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
Shane,
recently I merged in the social login code under "social". This is
plain vanilla code for login using facebook and google. I need to move
some code for twitter login.
Does this include the commit history? After the debacle with the IDM
merge, Pete gave me some advice on how to merge code from another
repository while retaining the history.
Next we are going to move the federation code under "federation". This
will provide the SAML object model/parsing/writing.
No problem, although it might take some time until we can look at
integrating this with the authentication API in PicketLink core. I
think the next step after finishing the IDM implementation should
probably be to get the social module integrated, although that's just my
opinion based on what I think most developers would more likely use.
Since I have OAuth2 implementation, I am wondering whether I should just
merge into social or keep a separate module called "oauth". I am leaning
toward the latter.
I'm ok with either option really. The term "social" is becoming a
little overloaded I think, so I have no problem putting OAuth into its
own module.
Unfortunately I couldn't make it to last week's RWP hangout so I missed
Antoine's presentation on Agorava. Are we planning on any joint effort
and/or integration with Agorava code?
Regards,
Anil
_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
4:16 a.m.
On 10/24/2012 08:08 PM, Shane Bryzak wrote:
On 10/25/2012 03:52 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
> Shane,
> recently I merged in the social login code under "social". This is
> plain vanilla code for login using facebook and google. I need to move
> some code for twitter login.
Does this include the commit history? After the debacle with the IDM
merge, Pete gave me some advice on how to merge code from another
repository while retaining the history.
If you can create a cheatsheet for the
merging process, it would help
out others.
I followed what I put in at the end of:
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/PicketLink21xReleaseProcedure/
The only burning issue with the IDM merge was the code was deleted
before we could check everything is ok. :)
> Next we are going to move the federation code under "federation". This
> will provide the SAML object model/parsing/writing.
No problem, although it might take some time until we can look at
integrating this with the authentication API in PicketLink core. I
think the next step after finishing the IDM implementation should
probably be to get the social module integrated, although that's just my
opinion based on what I think most developers would more likely use.
> Since I have OAuth2 implementation, I am wondering whether I should just
> merge into social or keep a separate module called "oauth". I am leaning
> toward the latter.
I'm ok with either option really. The term "social" is becoming a
little overloaded I think, so I have no problem putting OAuth into its
own module.
Unfortunately I couldn't make it to last week's RWP hangout so I missed
Antoine's presentation on Agorava. Are we planning on any joint effort
and/or integration with Agorava code?
Agorova is a full fledged social app. What we
need in PL is
authentication with social networks. We brainstormed the probability of
Agorova providing a thin library of JSON calls that we can use to
authenticate with social networks. Then both agorova and PL can use this
thin library.
4:29 p.m.
On 25 Oct 2012, at 02:08, Shane Bryzak wrote:
On 10/25/2012 03:52 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
> Shane,
> recently I merged in the social login code under "social". This is
> plain vanilla code for login using facebook and google. I need to move
> some code for twitter login.
Does this include the commit history? After the debacle with the IDM
merge, Pete gave me some advice on how to merge code from another
repository while retaining the history.
1) Get the final directory structure sorted out in the old repo (e.g. if you need it in a
subdir in the new repo, do that here - IOW the root of the old repo needs to look like you
want the merged in stuff to look like in the new repo
2) Add the old repo as a remote to the new repo
3) Do a normal merge.
>
> Next we are going to move the federation code under "federation". This
> will provide the SAML object model/parsing/writing.
No problem, although it might take some time until we can look at
integrating this with the authentication API in PicketLink core. I
think the next step after finishing the IDM implementation should
probably be to get the social module integrated, although that's just my
opinion based on what I think most developers would more likely use.
>
> Since I have OAuth2 implementation, I am wondering whether I should just
> merge into social or keep a separate module called "oauth". I am leaning
> toward the latter.
I'm ok with either option really. The term "social" is becoming a
little overloaded I think, so I have no problem putting OAuth into its
own module.
Unfortunately I couldn't make it to last week's RWP hangout so I missed
Antoine's presentation on Agorava. Are we planning on any joint effort
and/or integration with Agorava code?
>
> Regards,
> Anil
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
9:51 p.m.
I have merged the oauth code into PL in my fork. It is not yet merged
into the main PL master.
https://github.com/anilsaldhana/picketlink
Currently there is a lot of coupling into LDAP IDM implementation. That
needs to be fixed in the oauth stuff to be generic.
Feedback?
On 10/24/2012 12:52 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
Shane,
recently I merged in the social login code under "social". This is
plain vanilla code for login using facebook and google. I need to move
some code for twitter login.
Next we are going to move the federation code under "federation". This
will provide the SAML object model/parsing/writing.
Since I have OAuth2 implementation, I am wondering whether I should just
merge into social or keep a separate module called "oauth". I am leaning
toward the latter.
Regards,
Anil
4197
days inactive
4203
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Anil Saldhana -
Pete Muir -
Shane Bryzak