Currently the BaseService represents the service operations and a 'type' property - however this defines the nature of the interface, i.e. java or wsdl.

Currently for runtime governance (bam) we are using the service name as the way interacting components are identified. However outside the scope of the ESB, the link between sending and receiving components would be based on the shared interface type they use.

Therefore can the BaseService be enhanced to include the actual type of the interface - so for Java this would be the Java interface qualified name, and for WSDL it would be the qname for the port type.