Re: [teiid-designer-dev] Materialized Views

I think that's a decent idea, however, our new VDB framework does not use EMF anymore, so our built-in "build" framework that utilizes "validation rules" may not work. Currently we have no VDB-specific validation. JPAV, do our validation rules have to be implemented via EMF? and/or can they be applied to a simple IResource (i.e. xxxx.vdb file)? Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Doyle" <jdoyle(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Barry Lafond" <blafond(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: "teiid-dev" <teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt;, "teiid-designer-dev" <teiid-designer-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:43:22 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: [teiid-designer-dev] Materialized Views ----- "Barry Lafond" <blafond(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: ...... While it certainly would be best to add them automatically like we do for other models, would it be possibly to flag a missing Materialization Physical model as a validation error on a VDB without changing the metamodel? Would that be good enough?