[JBoss JIRA] (TEIIDDES-1452) Unable to install
by Steve Darnowsky (JIRA)
Steve Darnowsky created TEIIDDES-1452:
-----------------------------------------
Summary: Unable to install
Key: TEIIDDES-1452
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIIDDES-1452
Project: Teiid Designer
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Teiid Integration
Affects Versions: 7.7
Environment: teiid designer 7.7, eclipse 3.7.2
Reporter: Steve Darnowsky
Using Teiid designer 7.7 plug in in Eclipse 3.7.2. Created soruce model and then imported DDL. Selected import wsdl into source model procedure. Created connection profile that points to url for WSDL.Changed Source Model created in previous step. Status - "Existing model xxxx.xmi has connection profile for different wsdl. Continued to to next dialog. In the Procedure Defintion dialog added element name in Schema Contents window. Invalid Name error displayed - "The character "-" is not allowed...." Is there a workaround for the name restrictions? Also why is this status message displayed when I select an existing model in soruce definition dialog? If I select the radio button to generate legacy create and extract functions, the import completes successfully.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIIDDES-1229) CLONE - Add support for a comparable binary type
by Barry LaFond (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIIDDES-1229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu... ]
Barry LaFond resolved TEIIDDES-1229.
------------------------------------
Resolution: Done
Done
> CLONE - Add support for a comparable binary type
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIIDDES-1229
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIIDDES-1229
> Project: Teiid Designer
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Teiid Integration
> Reporter: Steven Hawkins
> Assignee: Barry LaFond
> Fix For: 8.0
>
>
> Teiid currently lacks a binary/varbinary type. Since we have both blob/clob, it would be natural to also introduce a varbinary analog to string. It would be a comparable type and need an escape syntax for entering literals. Translators would need to be modified to account for binary literals.
> See the forum post for current workarounds. We also as a one off have previously allowed clob types to be comparable, see also TEIID-1248. Another approach would by to allow clob/blob to comparable in Teiid, but possibly not at the source as per the searchability metadata. We would still need to support an escape syntax and modify translators to use native type information and the appropriate literal format. The advantage of this latter approach is that there is nothing more that designer must do to support this case. The most practical benefit from introducing a varbinary type would be in having a better size estimate (it would be limited to 8000 bytes) for buffering.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIIDDES-1229) CLONE - Add support for a comparable binary type
by Steven Hawkins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIIDDES-1229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu... ]
Steven Hawkins commented on TEIIDDES-1229:
------------------------------------------
we're using base64Binary on the Teiid side. Also, the type info for teiid is now in engine/src/manin/resources/org/teiid/metadata/types.dat
> CLONE - Add support for a comparable binary type
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIIDDES-1229
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIIDDES-1229
> Project: Teiid Designer
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Teiid Integration
> Reporter: Steven Hawkins
> Assignee: Barry LaFond
> Fix For: 8.0
>
>
> Teiid currently lacks a binary/varbinary type. Since we have both blob/clob, it would be natural to also introduce a varbinary analog to string. It would be a comparable type and need an escape syntax for entering literals. Translators would need to be modified to account for binary literals.
> See the forum post for current workarounds. We also as a one off have previously allowed clob types to be comparable, see also TEIID-1248. Another approach would by to allow clob/blob to comparable in Teiid, but possibly not at the source as per the searchability metadata. We would still need to support an escape syntax and modify translators to use native type information and the appropriate literal format. The advantage of this latter approach is that there is nothing more that designer must do to support this case. The most practical benefit from introducing a varbinary type would be in having a better size estimate (it would be limited to 8000 bytes) for buffering.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIIDDES-1229) CLONE - Add support for a comparable binary type
by Barry LaFond (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIIDDES-1229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu... ]
Barry LaFond commented on TEIIDDES-1229:
----------------------------------------
For 8.0 it'd be the simplest solution to add varbinary to our built-in datatypes xsd.
I need a base-type for varbinary and not sure which one. (i.e. open Desginer's Datatype Hiearchy View)
Would it be anySimpleType? or would I use the existing base64Binary as the base type?
> CLONE - Add support for a comparable binary type
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIIDDES-1229
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIIDDES-1229
> Project: Teiid Designer
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Teiid Integration
> Reporter: Steven Hawkins
> Assignee: Barry LaFond
> Fix For: 8.0
>
>
> Teiid currently lacks a binary/varbinary type. Since we have both blob/clob, it would be natural to also introduce a varbinary analog to string. It would be a comparable type and need an escape syntax for entering literals. Translators would need to be modified to account for binary literals.
> See the forum post for current workarounds. We also as a one off have previously allowed clob types to be comparable, see also TEIID-1248. Another approach would by to allow clob/blob to comparable in Teiid, but possibly not at the source as per the searchability metadata. We would still need to support an escape syntax and modify translators to use native type information and the appropriate literal format. The advantage of this latter approach is that there is nothing more that designer must do to support this case. The most practical benefit from introducing a varbinary type would be in having a better size estimate (it would be limited to 8000 bytes) for buffering.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIIDDES-1474) Preview Data on certain models causes JBDS to go into unrecoverable loop
by Blaine Mincey (JIRA)
Blaine Mincey created TEIIDDES-1474:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Preview Data on certain models causes JBDS to go into unrecoverable loop
Key: TEIIDDES-1474
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIIDDES-1474
Project: Teiid Designer
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Data Preview
Affects Versions: 7.1.1
Environment: Have attempted on both RHEL 6.3 and Mac OSX. Used JBDS 5.0 with latest plugins and EDS 5.3.
Reporter: Blaine Mincey
When using the FinancialsDemo, our internal demo project (https://docspace.corp.redhat.com/docs/DOC-56653), previewing data from the CustomerHoldings/BrokerageModel (models AccountHoldings, AccountValue, and HighNetWorthCustomers) causes JBDS/Teiid to go into an unrecoverable loop where you must abruptly "force quit" the IDE to regain control. I have also seen this behavior when attempting to preview data from one of the included Web Services in the project.
The following snippet is repeated multiple times in the EDS server log at the time that the process seems to get stuck in a loop:
2012-08-15 15:10:29,866 INFO [org.teiid.RUNTIME] (New I/O server worker #2-1) org.teiid.query.tempdata.GlobalTableStoreImpl@644ec403 first member or timeout exceeded
2012-08-15 15:10:29,881 INFO [org.teiid.PROCESSOR] (New I/O server worker #2-1) Clearing prepared plan cache for vdb PREVIEW_70a7a0cb-5c46-4589-aa1c-9018517e0c0f_FinancialsDemo_project.1
2012-08-15 15:10:29,882 INFO [org.teiid.PROCESSOR] (New I/O server worker #2-1) Clearing the resultset cache for vdb PREVIEW_70a7a0cb-5c46-4589-aa1c-9018517e0c0f_FinancialsDemo_project.1
2012-08-15 15:10:29,896 INFO [STDOUT] (New I/O server worker #2-1)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (TEIIDDES-595) ModelAnnotations Are Created When Models Are Deleted
by Dan Florian (JIRA)
ModelAnnotations Are Created When Models Are Deleted
----------------------------------------------------
Key: TEIIDDES-595
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/TEIIDDES-595
Project: Teiid Designer
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Modeling
Affects Versions: 7.1
Reporter: Dan Florian
Just selected a model in the Model Explorer and deleted it. I noticed that the ModelAnnotationImpl constructor was being called when the model was being deleted. This doesn't seem right but doesn't seem to affect anything. Here is the stack trace:
Daemon Thread [Thread-0] (Suspended (breakpoint at line 389 in ModelAnnotationImpl))
ModelAnnotationImpl.<init>() line: 389
CoreFactoryImpl.createModelAnnotation() line: 127
CoreFactoryImpl.create(EClass) line: 53
MtkXmiHelper(XMLHelperImpl).createObject(EFactory, EClassifier) line: 891
MtkXmiHandler.createObjectFromFactory(EFactory, String) line: 161
MtkXmiHandler.createTopObject(String, String) line: 192
MtkXmiHandler(XMLHandler).processElement(String, String, String) line: 1019
MtkXmiHandler(XMIHandler).processElement(String, String, String) line: 87
MtkXmiHandler(XMLHandler).startElement(String, String, String) line: 1001
MtkXmiHandler.startElement(String, String, String) line: 769
MtkXmiHandler(XMLHandler).startElement(String, String, String, Attributes) line: 712
MtkXmiHandler(XMIHandler).startElement(String, String, String, Attributes) line: 169
SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser(AbstractSAXParser).startElement(QName, XMLAttributes, Augmentations) line: 501
XMLDocumentScannerImpl(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl).scanStartElement() line: 1363
XMLDocumentScannerImpl$ContentDriver(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDriver).next() line: 2755
XMLDocumentScannerImpl.next() line: 648
XMLDocumentScannerImpl(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl).scanDocument(boolean) line: 511
XIncludeAwareParserConfiguration(XML11Configuration).parse(boolean) line: 808
XIncludeAwareParserConfiguration(XML11Configuration).parse(XMLInputSource) line: 737
SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser(XMLParser).parse(XMLInputSource) line: 119
SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser(AbstractSAXParser).parse(InputSource) line: 1205
SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser.parse(InputSource) line: 522
SAXParserImpl(SAXParser).parse(InputSource, DefaultHandler) line: 395
MtkXmiResourceLoader(XMLLoadImpl).load(XMLResource, InputStream, Map<?,?>) line: 181
MtkXmiResourceImpl.doLoad(InputStream, Map) line: 282
MtkXmiResourceImpl(ResourceImpl).load(InputStream, Map<?,?>) line: 1494
MtkXmiResourceImpl(ResourceImpl).load(Map<?,?>) line: 1282
MtkXmiResourceImpl.load(Map) line: 222
ModelBufferImpl.open(IProgressMonitor) line: 236
ModelResourceImpl.openBuffer(IProgressMonitor) line: 434
ModelResourceImpl(OpenableImpl).getBuffer() line: 381
ModelResourceImpl.refreshIndexType() line: 247
ModelWorkspaceManager$NotificationProcessor.refreshResourceIndexType(Object) line: 1162
ModelWorkspaceManager$NotificationProcessor.checkResourceForIndexing(Notification) line: 1137
ModelWorkspaceManager$NotificationProcessor.notifyChanged(Notification) line: 1151
ChangeNotifier.fireNotifyChanged(Notification) line: 51
UnitOfWorkImpl.commit() line: 251
ModelerCore.commitTxn() line: 356
DeleteResourceAction.closeResources(List) line: 324
DeleteResourceAction.doRun() line: 381
AbstractAction$1.run() line: 537
BusyIndicator.showWhile(Display, Runnable) line: 70
DeleteResourceAction(AbstractAction).run() line: 540
DeleteResourceAction(Action).runWithEvent(Event) line: 498
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 4 months