[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIIDDES-2925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu...
]
Van Halbert commented on TEIIDDES-2925:
---------------------------------------
Correct, the new JDG source tables should be created based on the class name.
There's no technical reason they have to be the same as the view that was selected to
be materialized.
Designer doesn't change java class name in the generated POJO
module
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: TEIIDDES-2925
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIIDDES-2925
Project: Teiid Designer
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Build
Affects Versions: 10.0.2
Environment: Fedora 24
Reporter: Matej Kralik
Assignee: Barry LaFond
Fix For: 10.0.2
Attachments: screenshot1.png, screenshot2.png
I have a table (for example PersonMatView) and I want to create materialization. I set
'create POJO' and set java class name to Person (screenshot1). After that in the
generated JDG module is Person.jar but in the jar, the class has name same like the table
(Personmatview.class). (screenshot2). Is it required to have class name same as
materialized table?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)