Ted can you take a look at this and make some assessment as to the approach (separate war akin to ws enablement, etc.), level of effort, etc. so that we can get this bucketed in the right project/release?
Also any updates for TEIID-1757 would be good if we want to pursue something more specific on our side.
In general we'll also be looking to add lower level json support since the current jsontoxml approach adds overhead that can be avoided if we have a direct jsontable/jsonquery analogous to xmltable/xmlquery. json construction logic could also be added similar to the sql/xml functions.
Ted can you take a look at this and make some assessment as to the approach (separate war akin to ws enablement, etc.), level of effort, etc. so that we can get this bucketed in the right project/release?
Also any updates for TEIID-1757 would be good if we want to pursue something more specific on our side.
In general we'll also be looking to add lower level json support since the current jsontoxml approach adds overhead that can be avoided if we have a direct jsontable/jsonquery analogous to xmltable/xmlquery. json construction logic could also be added similar to the sql/xml functions.