The change to the connector will not be picked up automatically be the designer, the kitting of Teiid into Designer is still has some manual steps, and it's done periodically.  but you can test the change by deploying the vdb into Teiid embedded or server once the fix is built.

Thanks for bringing this defect to us.

~jd  
----- "Mike Mascari" <mascarim@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
That's excellent news. I had grabbed the 6.2.0 M2 snapshot (v20090820) of teiid-designer. 

>
- Mike
>
>
>
From: John Doyle <jdoyle@redhat.com>
> To: Mike Mascari <mascarim@yahoo.com>
> Cc: teiid-users@lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2009 10:47:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [teiid-users] unexpected query results against XML data source
>

>
> Mike,
>
> The defect you've uncovered isn't the same as TEIID-93, it's much simpler and obvious.  I'm checking in a change for 6.2 today.  Are you working with 6.2 or 6.1?
>
> ~jd
> ----- "Mike Mascari" <mascarim@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
I've attached both the xml and the xsd used and re-tested the importation and query against them with the same result. Thanks for looking into it! Could it be the same issue as this:

> >

> >
??

> >
My issue is a much simpler case, however. The query needn't be pushed down as apart of the planner over a federated view to cause the irregularity -- one need only query the XML source directly. 

> >
Thanks again!

> >
And just for giggles:

> >
# xmllint --schema clients.xsd clients.xml 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<clients>
  <client>
    <name>acme</name>
    <rate>15</rate>
  </client>
  <client>
    <name>toolwerks</name>
    <rate>20</rate>
  </client>
</clients>
clients.xml validates

> >
:-)

> >
- Mike
> >
> >
> >
From: John Doyle <jdoyle@redhat.com>
> > To: Mike Mascari <mascarim@yahoo.com>
> > Cc: teiid-users@lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2009 11:48:24 AM
> > Subject: Re: [teiid-users] unexpected query results against XML data source
> >

> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > I've tried to reproduce this but get no root elements to select from during the import process.  Is it possible that the XSD pasted here is different from what you're using?
> >
> > ~jd
> > ----- "Mike Mascari" <mascarim@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
Hello. I've downloaded and installed the snapshot as of today (8/31/2009) and, using the designer:

> > >
1. Used Import->XML Schema as Relational Source Model

> > >
2. Selected Document over HTTP with no request parameters

> > >
3. Selected No Catalog

> > >
4. Chose "File System" as source of XML Schema (inlined below)

> > >
5. Chose "client" (I've tried w/"clients" as well) as the root element and "Finish"

> > >
6. Create a "purchasing" View Model and, with "purchasing" selected, created an "example" BaseTable. I then drag-and-drop "client" from clients.xmi Source Model into SOURCES pane. (This View abstraction turns out not to be the problem -- I query the Source via the Execute'd VDB with the same outcome.)

> > >
7. Created a "billing" vdb, cleaned, built, and synchronized.

> > >
8. Then, with this data served up by apache:

> > >
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<clients>
  <client>
    <name>acme</name>
    <rate>15</rate>
  </client>
  <client>
    <name>toolwerks</name>
    <rate>20</rate>
  </client>
</clients>

> > >
I issued the following query:

> > >
select * from clients.client

> > >
and received the expected result:

> > >
null;acme;15
null;toolwerks;20

> > >
9. Then I did this:

> > >
select * from clients.client where name = 'acme'

> > >
and received *two rows*:

> > >
null;acme;15
null;toolwerks;20

> > >
10. So I did this:

> > >
select * from clients.client where name != 'acme' 

> > >
and received the expected one row:

> > >
null;toolwerks;20

> > >
???

> > >
Is there something goofy with the equality operator against XML data? Is there flag that needs flipped on these attributes? I went with the "string" mapping on the 'XML Schema as Relational Source Model' dialog wizard (pane 4 IIRC). Oughtn't I have? I also changed XML node names that might have been SQL keywords ('name' -> 'fullname') but no dice...

> > >
Thoughts? 

> > >
- Mike

> > >
Schema:

> > >
<?xml version="1.0"?>

> > >
  <!-- our client database -->

> > >
  <xs:element name="clients">
  
    <xs:complexType>
      <xs:sequence>

> > >
        <!-- the client -->
              
        <xs:element name="client" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
          <xs:complexType>
            <xs:sequence>

> > >
              <!-- client name -->

> > >
              <xs:element name="name" type="xs:string" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1"/>

> > >
              <!-- bill rate -->

> > >
              <xs:element name="rate" minOccurs="0">
                <xs:simpleType>
                  <xs:restriction base="xs:decimal">
                    <xs:minInclusive value="50"/>
                    <xs:maxInclusive value="250"/>
                  </xs:restriction>
                </xs:simpleType>
              </xs:element>

> > >
            </xs:sequence>

> > >
          </xs:complexType>

> > >
        </xs:element>

> > >
      </xs:sequence>
    </xs:complexType>

> > >
  </xs:element>
</xs:schema>

> > >
> > >

> > >
> > > _______________________________________________ teiid-users mailing list teiid-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-users
> >

> >
> > _______________________________________________ teiid-users mailing list teiid-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-users
>

>