Somehow I completely missed your reply on this Stuart!  Thanks for providing that information.  I'm looking forward to what undertow 3 will bring.

In the meantime, did you see my question about getting a new component added to JIRA?  Also, any feedback on the tickets?  If my logging additions go well, my team will be more familiar with how all the internals work so hopefully we can help out with some of those tickets in the form of pull requests.

Thanks!

~Brad

Developer Advocate
Ortus Solutions, Corp 

ColdBox Platform: http://www.coldbox.org 



On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:03 PM Stuart Douglas <sdouglas@redhat.com> wrote:


On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 03:24, Brad Wood <bdw429s@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm working on an integration with Undertow's Predicate language in my Undertow-powered project, CommandBox.  I just wanted to say, this feature is super sweet and it's really going to provide a lot of value for my users to toss in quick text-based rules to control their server.

In case anyone else using this feature is curious, I've compiled a list of missing features and bugs from our initial proof of concept phase and I've entered the tickets below.  I'm willing to help send pulls for some of these, though I am a little curious regarding the future of Undertow and if Undertow 3 is really happening any time soon at this point or if I should just be focusing on Undertow 2.x for the foreseeable future.

Undertow 3 will basically be based on the Quarkus HTTP code (https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus-http). This takes Undertow, removes XNIO, and adds a connector layer to allow multiple connectors. Currently this only has a vert.x based connector, but as part of this work we would also add a pure Netty one so there is no required Vert.x dependency. Once this has been done the 'quarkus-http' repository will be archived.

Unfortunately everyone on the team has been extremely busy so it is hard to say exactly when this will happen, so for now I would focus on 2.x. From a users point of view there are definitely some API changes (the biggest one being no XNIO), but all the concepts should be pretty similar, so it should be relatively easy to port a 2.x app to 3.x.

Stuart
 

Also, on a side note, could a JIRA admin please add a "Predicate Language" component in JIRA for me to tag these tickets with?

Predicate Language Redirect handler doesn't allow custom status code
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1734
Predicate Language handler to set inline response body
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1736
Predicate Language response-code handler doesn't allow custom status text
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1735
Predicate Language access-control handler doesn't have failure-status parameter
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1737
Relax case sensitivity in Predicate Language for ease of use
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1738
Sub groups don't work with nested predicate
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1739
Predicate Language parsing fails on semi-colon before "else" keyword
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1740  

Thanks!

~Brad

Developer Advocate
Ortus Solutions, Corp 

ColdBox Platform: http://www.coldbox.org 

_______________________________________________
undertow-dev mailing list
undertow-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev