On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 6:00 AM Nishant Kumar <nishantkumar35@gmail.com> wrote:
I have tried XNIO 3.7.7-Final with jboss.threads 2.3.3.Final in Undertow 2.0.30.Final and it looks good so far. I am running it in production for the last 2 days and no issues so far :). I am monitoring it and will report if find anything.The reason I changed jboss thread version is that I observed a high CPU load in XNIO 3.7.7.Final comparing XNIO 3.3.8.Final which I reported in the last email. However, I have not done any extensive tests for it.On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 1:37 PM Nishant Kumar <nishantkumar35@gmail.com> wrote:I have also observed that the CPU load increases significantly on 3.7.7-Final (load average 50 on 48 core machine) on moderate load but it's very low (load average 20) on 3.3.8-Final on the same QPS (20k Req/sec) and it (3.7.7-Final) starts refusing connection on high load.On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 7:20 AM Nishant Kumar <nishantkumar35@gmail.com> wrote:I didn't get time to write standalone program to reproduce it but with new version 3.7.7-Final, i am not able to survive for more than an hour. With the older default xnio version of Undertow (xnio 3.3.8-Final) i can run server for few days until it stops working with error i mentioned in first email.Just FYI, i am using OpenJDK 11 with OpenJ9 JVM.On Wed, Mar 4, 2020, 10:54 AM Flavia Rainone <frainone@redhat.com> wrote:Can someone provide a reproducer for this error?As for the old version of XNIO, it will be upgraded in Undertow 2.1.0.Final.On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:47 PM Stuart Douglas <sdouglas@redhat.com> wrote:Hmm, maybe this is a bug in the HTTP/2 close code then, and somehow the connection is not being closed if the client hangs up abruptly. I had a quick look at the code though and I think it looks ok, but maybe some more investigation is needed.Stuart_______________________________________________On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 03:41, Nishant Kumar <nishantkumar35@gmail.com> wrote:Yes, i have no control on client side. I am using HTTP2. I have tried increasing open file limit to 400k but that consumes all memory and system hangs. I will probably try to put a nginx in front of Undertow and test.setServerOption(UndertowOptions.ENABLE_HTTP2, true)On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 7:48 PM David Lloyd <david.lloyd@redhat.com> wrote:On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 7:56 AM Stan Rosenberg <stan.rosenberg@acm.org> wrote:
>
> Stuck in CLOSE_WAIT is a symptom of the client-side not properly shutting down [1].
I would partially disagree. In the article you linked: "It all starts
with a listening application that leaks sockets and forgets to call
close(). This kind of bug does happen in complex applications." This
seems to be essentially what's happening here: the server isn't
completing the connection (for some reason), stranding the socket in
`CLOSE_WAIT`.
We can't assume that the client is abandoning the connection after
`FIN_WAIT2` (the titular RFC violation); if the server stays in
`CLOSE_WAIT`, then even if the client dutifully stays in `FIN_WAIT2`
forever, the resolving condition still needs to be that the server
shuts down its side of the connection.
This diagram is a useful visual aid, mapping TCP states to the XNIO
API: https://www.lucidchart.com/publicSegments/view/524ec20a-5c40-4fd0-8bde-0a1c0a0046e1/image.png
--
- DML
undertow-dev mailing list
undertow-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev------_______________________________________________
undertow-dev mailing list
undertow-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
