In general you are much better off using LoadBalancingProxyClient
(even if there is only one server). SimpleProxyClient uses a 1-1
connection mapping, while LoadBalancingProxyClient uses connection
pools and in general is much more sophisticated.

I am not sure what to do about SimpleProxyClient, I think it should
probably just be deprecated and removed in a future release.

Stuart

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Hicks, Matt <matt@matthicks.com> wrote:
> In
> https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/blob/master/examples/src/main/java/io/undertow/examples/http2/Http2Server.java
> a LoadBalancingProxyClient and a reverse proxy server are being used to
> proxy HTTPS, but is all of that necessary?
>
> I'm attempting to proxy from my current code:
>
> SimpleProxyClientProvider proxyClient = new SimpleProxyClientProvider(uri);
> ProxyHandler proxyHandler = Handlers.proxyHandler(proxyClient);
>
> To add support to proxy SSL. The proxying is local and both the originating
> server and the server being proxied to are using the exact same SSL
> certificate.  Is there something I can add to this to make it work right, or
> do I have to create a LoadBalancingProxyClient?
>
> _______________________________________________
> undertow-dev mailing list
> undertow-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev