If I have some code ala theRequest.getRequestReceiver().receiveFullString((theExchange, str) -> { ... }); Is it ok to perform a time consuming task w/ the body of the request in the callback, or is it better to move off the io thread and use `HttpServerExchange.getInputStream`? Cheers, Mike _______________________________________________ undertow-dev mailing list undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev

Correct me if I am wrong Stuart but if the request was already dispatched before calling the getRequestReceiver(), then the callback will be handled by a worker thread. Cheers, Antoine On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > No, the callback is invoked by the IO thread, so you would need to > dispatch to a worker thread. > > Stuart > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Michael Grove <mike(a)stardog.com&gt; wrote: > > If I have some code ala > > > > theRequest.getRequestReceiver().receiveFullString((theExchange, str) -> > > { > > ... > > }); > > > > Is it ok to perform a time consuming task w/ the body of the request in > > the > > callback, or is it better to move off the io thread and use > > `HttpServerExchange.getInputStream`? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > > undertow-dev mailing list > > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev > _______________________________________________ > undertow-dev mailing list > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev

So what would be the right workflow using Receiver to read a large request, do something time-consuming, and send back a response? Use Receiver callbacks to write partial payloads to disk, and the last callback then dispatch to a worker thread? Cheers, Mike On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > It will generally be handled by an IO thread, although it can depend > on how large the request is. If a request is small enough that it gets > read immediately then the request will be handled in the same thread, > otherwise it will be handled by the IO thread to full read the > request. > > Stuart > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Antoine Girard > <antoine.girard(a)ymail.com&gt; wrote: > > Correct me if I am wrong Stuart but if the request was already > > dispatched > > before calling the getRequestReceiver(), then the callback will be > > handled > > by a worker thread. > > > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Stuart Douglas <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; > > wrote: > >> > >> No, the callback is invoked by the IO thread, so you would need to > >> dispatch to a worker thread. > >> > >> Stuart > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Michael Grove <mike(a)stardog.com&gt; > >> wrote: > >> > If I have some code ala > >> > > >> > theRequest.getRequestReceiver().receiveFullString((theExchange, str) > >> > -> > >> > { > >> > ... > >> > }); > >> > > >> > Is it ok to perform a time consuming task w/ the body of the request > >> > in > >> > the > >> > callback, or is it better to move off the io thread and use > >> > `HttpServerExchange.getInputStream`? > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > > >> > Mike > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > undertow-dev mailing list > >> > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev > >> _______________________________________________ > >> undertow-dev mailing list > >> undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev > > > >