Reza,
I think you have proposed a really nice idea. It would be excellent to get the folks who have translated the specification into working software both to:
- get their perspective on the technology
- provide insight about how best leverage it
- where the implementation took initiative and went beyond the spec
- etc.
Plus, it presents a unified front of supporters of the specification and its value to the platform.
If you are willing to prepare an abstract, then go ahead and post it to this thread and we'll provide some feedback/revisions.
Cheers,
-Dan
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Reza Rahman
<reza_rahman@lycos.com> wrote:
Gentlefolk,
I am trying to organize and submit a CDI implementor panel BOF for
JavaOne 2010. I approached David Blevins (whom I've co-presented with in
the past and is a good friend) and did get commitment from him to
participate on behalf of Apache/OpenWebBeans. I certainly would be happy
to represent Resin/CanDI in the panel. I was wondering if there would be
interest from the Weld/Seam 3 team to co-submit for the BOF/participate
in a panel discussing our respective projects with the JavaOne
community. I believe it would demonstrate the kind of
cohesion/collaboration that often seems to lack between competing Java
EE product vendors.
Personally, I don't care too much who does the actual submission for the
panel/does the write-up/organizing. If it makes the most sense for
someone from the Weld/Seam team to do it, I am happy to defer the leg
work...
Thanks in advance for your help,
Reza Rahman
=============================
Resin EJB 3.1 Lite Container Developer
Expert Group Member, Java EE 6 and EJB 3.1
Author, EJB 3 in Action
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminactionhttp://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen