> Btw, we would be very interested in tying this into Arquillian. If you have
> ideas, or just want to get the conversation started, head over the the
> discussion forums

After some off-list talks tying Perf4j into Arquillian would be probably
postponed until some future version of Arquillian. In the meantime I
will try to use Arquillian to test Perf4CDI itself.