OH come on.  Can't you be more creative than that, it's the weekend after all?  It's like being trapped in a jail cell, the JVM, and you'll never break free until you break the rules somehow.  We need some kind of advantage over the other groups: http://deoxy.org/hs_cehn.htm

what kind of an elevation is OOP or AOP really when you consider invisible dimensions?  there's gotta be something else lurking invisibly somewhere...

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king@gmail.com> wrote:
OK, great. I've just decided to break the rules and say that up is
down. You should all be lying on the ceiling by now.

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Arbi Sookazian <asookazian@gmail.com> wrote:
> don't you hate the rules?  it was an interesting question... break the
> rules.
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Eh? By definition you can't do anything with the type system at *runtime*!
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Would it be doable to use e.g. Javassist to transform a class into one
>> > of those static typesafe "entity classes" at runtime?
>> >
>> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Arbi Sookazian <asookazian@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Looks like there are two tables (users and permissions) but
>> >> testQuery2() and
>> >> testQuery3() both select only from one table - users.  So now we need a
>> >> small db schema (i.e. data model).  The typical customers and orders
>> >> would
>> >> suffice to demo FK and potential outer joins.  How can I define
>> >> customerId
>> >> as a FK on orders table?  Ideally, it would be nice to be able to do
>> >> all
>> >> this via tooling (i.e. exec a wizard that would generate the code for
>> >> us).
>> >> But we need to be able to do all this via the API for now...
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> New rev, with ability to pass SQL as strings.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > Latest, with a new approach to specifying types.
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Gavin King
>> >>> gavin.king@gmail.com
>> >>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>> >>> http://hibernate.org
>> >>> http://seamframework.org
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> weld-dev mailing list
>> >>> weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> weld-dev mailing list
>> >> weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > ---
>> > Nik
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gavin King
>> gavin.king@gmail.com
>> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>> http://hibernate.org
>> http://seamframework.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> weld-dev mailing list
>> weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>



--
Gavin King
gavin.king@gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org