Dne 19.11.2015 v 10:07 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> Hi Martin,
>
> The issue is that the specialized bean is not enabled for
> beans-xml-modified2.jar.

Yep, but the spec does not state this should be taken into account.

> @Alternative @Specialized annotated beans should not be active if
it is
> not enabled. I think the specialized should not be active if the
> alternative is not. Otherwise, we run into the situation where the
> specialized bean disabled a second bean but itself is not active.
>
> ok. I'll post the question on cdi-dev.
>
> Many thanks,
> Emily
> ===========================
> Emily Jiang
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> Phone:  +44 (0)1962 816278  Internal: 246278
>
> Email: emijiang@uk.ibm.com
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>
>
>
>
> From: Martin Kouba <mkouba@redhat.com>
> To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
> Cc: Weld <weld-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> Date: 19/11/2015 07:46
> Subject: Re: [weld-dev] potential weld jira
> Sent by: weld-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> The enablement is per bean archive but specialization is not, see
also
> 4.3. Specialization:
>
> "When an enabled bean, as defined in Enabled and disabled beans,
> specializes a second bean, we can be certain that the second bean
is
> never instantiated or called by the container. Even if the second
bean
> defines a producer or observer method, the method will never be called."
>
> In other words, AlternativeCounterProducerModified (which is enabled
in
> beans-xml-modified.jar) specializes CounterProducerModified. And so
> CounterProducerModified is not enabled for beans-xml-modified2.jar
> because it is specialized by any other enabled bean.
>
> Feel free to post a question to the cdi-dev ML.
>
> Martin
>
> Dne 18.11.2015 v 18:14 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
>  > Thank you Martin!
>  >
>  > I interpreted this enablement differently.
>  >
>  > The CDI 1.2 spec states:
>  >
>  > A bean is said to be /enabled/ if:
>  >
>  >   * it is deployed in a bean archive, and
>  >   * it is not a producer method or field of a disabled
bean, and
>  >   * it is not specialized by any other enabled bean,
as defined in
>  >     _Specialization_
>  >     <
http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#specialization
>,
>  >     and either
>  >   * it is not an alternative, or it is a selected
alternative of at
>  >     least one bean archive or the application.
>  >
>  > Otherwise, the bean is said to be disabled.
>  >
>  >   In the above app, there are two jars. The jar
>  > beans-xml-modified2.jar.jar  does not enable the alternative
and in its
>  > injection, it should only see the CounterProducerModified.
While in
>  > another jar, the alternative AlternativeCounterProducerModified
>  > completely disabled the CounterProducerModified. Any injection
in that
>  > jar should only see the specialized bean.
>  >
>  >  From what you explained, the beans.xml in one jar
enabled the
>  > alternative bean and affect other jars. From my understanding,
the
>  > enablement of alternatives/interceptors are specific for
that archive
>  > and should not affect other jars.
>  >
>  > Also OpenWebBeans behaves differently from Weld, and OpenWebBeans
does
>  > what I have expected (enablement are per jar only).
>  >
>  > Many thanks,
>  > Emily
>  > ===========================
>  > Emily Jiang
>  > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
>  >
>  > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
>  > Phone:  +44 (0)1962 816278  Internal: 246278
>  >
>  > Email: emijiang@uk.ibm.com
>  > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > From: Martin Kouba <mkouba@redhat.com>
>  > To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
>  > Cc: Weld <weld-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>  > Date: 18/11/2015 15:52
>  > Subject: Re: potential weld jira
>  >
>  > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Well, it seems the problem is that CounterProducerModified
is
>  > specialized by AlternativeCounterProducerModified and so
it's not
>  > enabled and therefore it's producer method is also disabled
(see also
>  > 5.1.2. Enabled and disabled beans [1]), i.e. it's not available
for
>  > injection in beans-xml-modified2.jar. And
>  > AlternativeCounterProducerModified is an alternative which
is not
>  > selected for beans-xml-modified2.jar.
>  >
>  > It should work if you enable AlternativeCounterProducerModified
globally
>  > or select AlternativeCounterProducerModified for beans-xml-modified2.jar.
>  >
>  > Martin
>  >
>  > [1]
>  > 
http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#enablement

>  >
>  > Dne 18.11.2015 v 16:14 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
>  >  > Hi Martin,
>  >  >
>  >  > Here's a simplified form of the test case:
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > The application does not start, reporting
>  >  >
>  >  > [ERROR   ] CWWKZ0004E: An exception occurred
while starting the
>  >  > application testDiffBDA. The exception message
was:
>  >  > com.ibm.ws.container.service.state.StateChangeException:
>  >  > org.jboss.weld.exceptions.DeploymentException:
WELD-001408:
> Unsatisfied
>  >  > dependencies for type String with qualifiers
@CounterModifiedQualifier
>  >  >    at injection point [BackedAnnotatedField]
@Inject
>  >  > @CounterModifiedQualifier
>  >  >
>  >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified2.modifiedProducer
>  >  >    at
>  >  >
>  >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified2.modifiedProducer(CounterProducerConsumerModified2.java:0)
>  >  >
>  >  > There are five classes in the .war.
>  >  >
>  >  > testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/classes/test/diff/web/FrontEndServlet.class
>  >  >
>  >  > @Inject CounterProducerConsumerModified2 bean;
>  >  >
>  >  > This class, CounterProducerConsumerModified2.class
is packaged in the
>  >  > first of two WEB-INF/lib jars, at
>  >  >
>  >
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified2.jar.jar/com/ibm/jcdi/test/beans/xml.
>  >  > There is a bean that needs another bean injected
into it:
>  >  >
>  >  > @Inject@CounterModifiedQualifierString modifiedProducer;
>  >  >
>  >  > The remaining three classes are all in the second
WEB-INF/lib jar, at
>  >  >
>  >
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified.jar.jar/com/ibm/jcdi/test/beansxml/.
>  >  > The classes are
>  >  >
>  >  > CounterModifiedQualifier  (the interface)
>  >  > CounterProducerModified (the bean implementing
that interface)
>  >  > AlternativeCounterProducerModified (an alternative
bean)
>  >  >
>  >  > The AlternativeCounterProducerModified class
is declared in
>  >  >
>  >
> testDiffBDA.war/WEB-INF/lib/beans-xml-modified.jar.jar/META-INF/beans.xml,
>  >  >
>  >  > <alternatives>
>  >  >
>  >
> <class>com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.AlternativeCounterProducerModified</class>
>  >  > </alternatives>
>  >  >
>  >  > The test app starts correctly if the <alternative>
stanza is
>  > commented out.
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > Many thanks,
>  >  > Emily
>  >  > ===========================
>  >  > Emily Jiang
>  >  > WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development
Lead
>  >  >
>  >  > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England,
SO21 2JN
>  >  > Phone:  +44 (0)1962 816278  Internal:
246278
>  >  >
>  >  > Email: emijiang@uk.ibm.com
>  >  > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > From: Martin Kouba <mkouba@redhat.com>
>  >  > To: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB, Weld <weld-dev@lists.jboss.org>,
>  >  > Date: 18/11/2015 07:58
>  >  > Subject: Re: potential weld jira
>  >  >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > Hi Emily,
>  >  >
>  >  > a brief description would be helpful - it's
not a trivial
>  >  > deployment/reproducer.
>  >  >
>  >  > Martin
>  >  >
>  >  > Dne 16.11.2015 v 23:15 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
>  >  >  > I'm trying to deploy the attached
war but got Weld alidation
> error. On
>  >  >  > Glassfish 4.1, I got this error:
>  >  >  > Error occurred during deployment:
Exception while loading the app
>  > : CDI
>  >  >  > deployment failure:WELD-001408: Unsatisfied
dependencies for type
>  > String
>  >  >  > with qualifiers @DiffBDACounterQualifier
at injection point
>  >  >  > [BackedAnnotatedField] @Inject @DiffBDACounterQualifier
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified.diffBDAProducer
>  >  >  > at
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerConsumerModified.diffBDAProducer(CounterProducerConsumerModified.java:0)
>  >  >  > WELD-001475: The following beans
match by type, but none have
> matching
>  >  >  > qualifiers: - Producer Method [String]
with qualifiers
>  >  >  > [@CounterUnmodifiedQualifier @Any]
declared as
>  > [[BackedAnnotatedMethod]
>  >  >  > @ExcludeClassInterceptors @Produces
@CounterUnmodifiedQualifier
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
> com.ibm.jcdi.test.beansxml.CounterProducerNoModifiers.getCounterBeanProducer()],
>  >  >  > - Producer Method [String] with qualifiers
[@BatchProperty @Any]
>  >  >  > declared as [[UnbackedAnnotatedMethod]
@Produces @Dependent
>  >  >  > @BatchProperty public
> com.ibm.jbatch.container.cdi.BatchProducerBean.p
>  >  >  > .... msg.seeServerLog
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > The app works fine on OpenWebBeans.
Any ideas on what was wrong?
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > Many thanks,
>  >  >  > Emily
>  >  >  > ===========================
>  >  >  > Emily Jiang
>  >  >  > WebSphere Application Server, CDI
Development Lead
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire,
England, SO21 2JN
>  >  >  > Phone:  +44 (0)1962 816278  Internal:
246278
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > Email: emijiang@uk.ibm.com
>  >  >  > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > --
>  >  > Martin Kouba
>  >  > Software Engineer
>  >  > Red Hat, Czech Republic
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Martin Kouba
>  > Software Engineer
>  > Red Hat, Czech Republic
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
> 
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev

>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU
>

-- 
Martin Kouba
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev@lists.jboss.org

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev