We had been discussing with Dan and Lincoln on activating the conversation context for the entire request as it didn't seem to be a direct contradiction of the spec and Shane needed it for something about the same time so it got committed. I mailed the EG and asked about it but we can revert for now.

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com> wrote:
Guys,

This doesn't seem in line with the spec to me, and I think we should revert it. What is the motivation for doing it?

Pete

Begin forwarded message:

> From: weld-commits@lists.jboss.org
> Date: 1 April 2010 07:48:18 GMT+01:00
> To: weld-commits@lists.jboss.org
> Subject: [weld-commits] Weld SVN: r6071 - in core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld: servlet and 1 other directory.
> Reply-To: weld-commits@lists.jboss.org
>
> Author: shane.bryzak@jboss.com
> Date: 2010-04-01 02:48:18 -0400 (Thu, 01 Apr 2010)
> New Revision: 6071
>
> Modified:
>   core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld/jsf/WeldPhaseListener.java
>   core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld/servlet/ServletLifecycle.java
> Log:
> moved conversation setup/teardown out of jsf phase listener into servlet lifecycle (Nik says to blame me if this doesn't work ;)
>
>
> Modified: core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld/jsf/WeldPhaseListener.java
> ===================================================================
> --- core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld/jsf/WeldPhaseListener.java   2010-03-31 03:21:16 UTC (rev 6070)
> +++ core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld/jsf/WeldPhaseListener.java   2010-04-01 06:48:18 UTC (rev 6071)
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
>    private void beforeRestoreView(FacesContext facesContext)
>    {
>       log.trace(INITIATING_CONVERSATION, "Restore View");
> -      initiateSessionAndConversation(facesContext);
> +      //initiateSessionAndConversation(facesContext);
>    }
>
>    /**
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
>    private void afterRenderResponse(FacesContext facesContext)
>    {
>       log.trace(CLEANING_UP_CONVERSATION, "Render Response", "response complete");
> -      getConversationManager().teardownConversation();
> +      //getConversationManager().teardownConversation();
>    }
>
>    /**
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
>    private void afterResponseComplete(FacesContext facesContext, PhaseId phaseId)
>    {
>       log.trace(CLEANING_UP_CONVERSATION, phaseId, "the response has been marked complete");
> -      getConversationManager().teardownConversation();
> +      //getConversationManager().teardownConversation();
>    }
>
>    /**
>
> Modified: core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld/servlet/ServletLifecycle.java
> ===================================================================
> --- core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld/servlet/ServletLifecycle.java        2010-03-31 03:21:16 UTC (rev 6070)
> +++ core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/weld/servlet/ServletLifecycle.java        2010-04-01 06:48:18 UTC (rev 6071)
> @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@
>          request.setAttribute(REQUEST_ATTRIBUTE_NAME, beanStore);
>          lifecycle.beginRequest(request.getRequestURI(), beanStore);
>          restoreSessionContext(request);
> +         conversationManager(request.getSession().getServletContext()).setupConversation(request.getParameter("cid"));
>       }
>    }
>
> @@ -176,10 +177,12 @@
>       {
>          return;
>       }
> -      teardownSession(request);
> +
> +      conversationManager(request.getSession().getServletContext()).teardownConversation();
>       teardownRequest(request);
>       lifecycle.getConversationContext().setBeanStore(null);
>       lifecycle.getConversationContext().setActive(false);
> +      teardownSession(request);
>    }
>
>    private void teardownSession(HttpServletRequest request)
>
> _______________________________________________
> weld-commits mailing list
> weld-commits@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-commits


_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev



--
---
Nik