On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:27 AM Matej Novotny <manovotn@redhat.com> wrote:
Once again, please post questions like these to weld-dev mailing list.

Fair.  Thanks for answering.
 
To answer you, I think both of the predicates would be illegal bean types.
It doesn't matter if you actually "hide" the wildcard inside another parameter type.

OK, so "contains" truly means "contains": as the type is navigated, any occurrence of a wildcard encountered is illegal, no matter how "deep".

And this is because why, exactly?  I'm sure there's a reason; my slow brain is just not seeing it this morning.

Best,
Laird