---

From: Gavin King <gavin.king@gmail.com>
To: Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com>
Cc: weld-dev@lists.jboss.org; Joseph Bergmark <bergmark@apache.org>
Sent: Fri, February 5, 2010 9:09:28 PM
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Question regarding behavior of Decorated dependent scoped beans

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com> wrote:
> Sorry, we lost this email.
>
> On 18 Jan 2010, at 23:07, Joseph Bergmark wrote:
>
>> While verifying the behavior of decorated dependent scoped beans on OpenWebBeans, Gurkan mentioned that he observed the same behavior on WELD.  While verifying myself I noticed two behaviors that seem to conflict with the spec.
>>
>> 1) Non-normal scoped beans don't have any restrictions on public fields.  A quick test showed that changes made to public fields directly are not reflected when a call to a getter method that returns that value of the public field is made.  Presumably this is because there is an proxy like object in the middle.
>>
>> For example
>>
>> @Inject MyBean myBean;
>>
>> myBean.number = 7;
>> myBean.getNumber(); //would return the default value for number and not 7 which it was just set to.
>
> Correct, I don't think the spec covers this.

Interceptors and decorators are supposed to be implemented by
subclassing, not by proxying.

--
Gavin King
gavin.king@gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org

_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev