I would simply call it "JSR-299 - Dependency Injection", or even "Contextual Dependency Injection".
I am the same thoughts with Jay. Why do you have a plan to change name WebBeans? I think WebBeans is a great.
Same with the Manager interface, I think there is no need to change Manager name. It did its job.
Gurkan
From: Jay Balunas <tech4j@gmail.com>
To: Gavin King <gavin@hibernate.org>
Cc: Michael Keith <michael.keith@oracle.com>; WebBeans <webbeans-dev@lists.jboss.org>; Java Community Process JSR #299 Expert List <JSR-299-EG@jcp.org>; Jim Knutson <knutson@us.ibm.com>; Scott Ferguson <ferg@caucho.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 6:15:00 PM
Subject: Re: [webbeans-dev] New name
What are the complaints? Is it "Web Beans" itself or the whole spec name?
Web Beans already has recognition. I know I don't have the inside scoop, but I think changing the name would cause some confusion.
my $.02,
-Jay
On Dec 21, 2008, at 2:21 AM, Gavin King wrote:
> Some people don't like the name of the spec.
>
> What would *you* call it?
>
> --Gavin King
> gavin.king@gmail.com
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> http://hibernate.org
> http://seamframework.org
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
> webbeans-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
_______________________________________________
webbeans-dev mailing list
webbeans-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
_______________________________________________
webbeans-dev mailing list
webbeans-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev