On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Clint Popetz <
cpopetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Pete Muir <
pmuir@bleepbleep.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Mark Struberg <
struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> >
>> > short question:
>> >
>> >> * removing interceptor language from spec
>> >
>> > Hmm without interceptors, how should we handle @Transactional and stuff?
>> > Having interceptors in the standard is pretty convenient.
>>
>> This got moved to the managed bean specification which 299 depends on.
>
> What exactly is the "Managed Beans specification?" It's referenced in two
> places in the spec. Is it another JSR? Where do we get a copy? The only
> specified "Managed Bean" I know of is in JSF...I presume that's not what's
> referenced here.
>
> -Clint
>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > LieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>> > --- Pete Muir <
pmuir@bleepbleep.org.uk> schrieb am Do, 21.5.2009:
>> >
>> >> Von: Pete Muir <
pmuir@bleepbleep.org.uk>
>> >> Betreff: [webbeans-dev] Towards CR1
>> >> An:
webbeans-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> >> CC:
ee6jboss@sun.com,
roger.kitain@sun.com
>> >> Datum: Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2009, 19:36
>> >> All,
>> >>
>> >> As you've seen, Gavin is approaching publishing the PFD of
>> >> 299; before the final draft can be submitted, we need to
>> >> complete both the RI and TCK. We're under quite a tight
>> >> schedule - we have around 6 weeks.
>> >>
>> >> 1) Shane will update the TCK audit (which maps the spec to
>> >> the tests) to the current draft. Hopefully we will start to
>> >> see this coming through early next week. Once this is done,
>> >> we'll have a better idea of how much work there is to do.
>> >>
>> >> 2) David will take the lead on updating tests to the new
>> >> TCK, with Shane working to help him. The order in which the
>> >> tests are done should be same as for the RI
>> >>
>> >> 3) We'll do the major work on the RI in this priority
>> >> order:
>> >> - New SPI
>> >> - New bootstrap
>> >> - decorators
>> >> - New resource handling stuff
>> >> - minor fixes and changes as a result of
>> >> the new spec language
>> >>
>> >> If you want to take on any of the above, please shout now!
>> >>
>> >> We still need clarification from Gavin/EG on:
>> >>
>> >> * removing interceptor language from spec
>> >> * exactly how this inter-relates with the managed bean
>> >> spec
>> >> * exactly how we proceed when the RI supports a particular
>> >> function which requires container integration, and no one
>> >> container supports all integration points.
>> >>
>> >> I don't plan any interim releases between now and CR1, as
>> >> releases take time, and we are under a tight schedule. These
>> >> changes don't generally impact the core functionality
>> >> (except around bootstrap), so I am confident that we don't
>> >> need another beta.
>> >>
>> >> I do plan a reasonably long series of CRs to ensure that
>> >> the codebase is stable, I don't have a firm date for the
>> >> release yet. Once we enter the CR series, the 299 API and
>> >> the Web Beans API/SPI cannot change.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for all your hard work so far - getting to CR1 is a
>> >> major milestone!
>> >>
>> >> Pete
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> webbeans-dev mailing list
>> >>
webbeans-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pete Muir
>>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>>
http://www.seamframework.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> webbeans-dev mailing list
>>
webbeans-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Clint Popetz
>
http://42lines.net
> Scalable Web Application Development
>
> _______________________________________________
> webbeans-dev mailing list
>
webbeans-dev@lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
>
>
--