----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Sviridov" <ooo_saturn7(a)mail.ru>
To: "Matej Novotny" <manovotn(a)redhat.com>, "weld-dev"
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 2:09:56 PM
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Weld and JPMS
Thank you for such a detailed answer. If I understand you right Weld in not
modular according to JPMS specs.
If so, then are there any plans (opened issues) to make it modular?
There are no opened issues at the moment, feel free to create one, however I cannot
guarantee you any time-bound implementation.
Weld is (as as a reference implementation of CDI) mainly looking at EE and there we need
to see how EE-world deals with the burden that is called JPMS.
When it comes to SE, the problem is we will need to come up with something that, in the
same time, won't break EE behaviour (SE is re-using same core as is in EE and so
Besides, one question is very interesting for me - will Weld create separate
container for every JPMS module
or Weld will create one container for all JPMS modules?
Not sure I understand you correctly, but I see no benefit in running parallel Weld
Weld will have to behave as it did until now (backward compatibility), which effectively
means one container for all JPMS modules in that deployment.
Best regards, Alex
>Среда, 9 мая 2018, 14:54 +03:00 от Matej Novotny <manovotn(a)redhat.com>:
>in short, there is no official documentation on that because Weld runs in
>JDK 9 and 10 are short-termed releases and will have no special support.
>JDK 11 is something we should be looking at and we are doing that (lately we
>added support to avoid illegal access there for instance).
>When it comes to JPMS itself, the question is, in what environment are you
>If it's EE (e.g. in a server like WildFly), then all magic needs to be
>worked on server side, pretty much.
>I know WildFly already has some of it, but I am pretty sure at this point
>most servers won't fully support JPMS.
>If in SE, then Weld itself is not defined as JPMS module and hence will end
>up in an unnamed module (Weld has no module-info).
>There is no way we can avoid deep reflection on your classes (for instance
>to be able to intercept non-public methods), therefore you need to make
>sure your classes
>allow us to do that (or rather to unnamed module where Weld resides ATM).
>Having done that, it should work.
>----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Alex Sviridov" < ooo_saturn7(a)mail.ru >
>> To: "weld-dev" < weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 9:51:38 AM
>> Subject: [weld-dev] Weld and JPMS
>> Hi all
>> Half a year has passed since Java 9 release. Can anyone say if there are
>> solutions etc how to work with JPMS in Weld?
>> Alex Sviridov
>> weld-dev mailing list