Brian,
CLI has 3 calls to /deployment=x:read-resource that don't have
include-runtime=true. But from what I see, if suddenly subsystems
are not returned, it wouldn't change anything.
JF
I've checked HAL.next and we only use "include-runtime=true" when reading deployment related resources This applies for both standalone and domain mode.
I didn't check HAL.current yet, but I'm quite sure we use the same semantics here. So fixing the bug shouldn't affect neither HAL.next nor HAL.current.
CheersHarald
On 28. Nov 2017, at 19:16, Brian Stansberry <brian.stansberry@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Harald,
Does HAL always include the "include-runtime=true" param when doing a read of resources under a /deployment=x resource?
I'm asking because I noticed an annoying problem when trying to do some cleanup of whether runtime-only resources correctly report themselves as such.[1] It turns out we have a bug where must subsystem resources under /deployment=* don't report themselves as runtime-only, which means they show up in an op like this, even though they should not:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/4WGJ7~UpeJvR0tqtEDYfNg
The "subsystem=undertow" child should not appear because the op used "include-runtime=false". So that's a bug.
I probably won't fix that bug any time soon, because "include-runtime=false" is the default behavior. Which mean this is a bug that some users may be counting on. :( One example being Arquillian -- see [2]. But I'm wondering whether HAL is an example of that. If it is, it's something that should be corrected. At some point we may have to correct this.
Jean-Francois Denise, I have the same question for you re: CLI.
Emmanuel Hugonnet -- I'm hoping this isn't a significant problem for your provisioning feature-spec work. If it is maybe we can find a way to work around. These resource types are not relevant on an admin-only server and my guess any feature-spec generation would use an admin-only process.
Cheers,
--
Brian StansberryManager, Senior Principal Software EngineerRed Hat
_______________________________________________ wildfly-dev mailing list wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev