If you are specifically talking about the testsuite/elytron module, I believe we can leave those under org.wildfly.test.integration.elytron. Stuart's gripe, as I read it, is mixing of the two packages within a module.

> On 6 Apr 2017, at 07:56, Josef Cacek <jcacek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I think, Tomaz should share his view (CC-ing)
>
> During our discussion related to Elytron testing, his preference was to use org.wildfly package names.
>
> -- Josef
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas@gmail.com>
>> To: wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Monday, April 3, 2017 3:45:59 AM
>> Subject: [wildfly-dev] Mixing org.jboss.as and org.wildfly packages
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> So this is a minor issue, but it annoys me so I thought I would see what
>> other people think about it. In the test suite I have noticed that some new
>> code is being added under the org.wildfly package, even though all the
>> existing code is still under org.jboss.as .
>>
>> I don't think this is a good idea, as it means there is two potential places
>> to look for something, with no real reason why something is in a particular
>> package other than the date it was added.
>>
>> I propose that we move all the org.wildfly code into org.jboss.as to keep
>> everything consistent (moving everything to org.wildfly would also be an
>> option, but it has implications for backporting and has the potential to
>> create a lot more work).
>>
>> Does anyone have any objections to this? If not I will prepare some PR's.
>>
>> Stuart
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev


_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev