Thanks for your input!

The alias and global naming does actually work!

Br,
Martin Andersson
Java EE developer at www.purplescout.se



On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com> wrote:

On Jan 31, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On Jan 31, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Martin Andersson <martin.andersson@purplescout.se> wrote:
>
>> I agree. I don't think mapping a datasource in jboss-web.xml is such an exotic use case. I should just work.
>
> It’s not, it’s actually implied by the standard, as you can define them in web.xml as well. It’s a lifecycle problem we need to solve.
>
>> Also, there is no hint anywere that there is a property you can set to make it work.
>>
>> The proprietary jboss namespace is not an option since I want to be vendor neutral, but ear/java:app is definitely an option.
>
> Another solution specific to EE7 is you can leave the jta-data-source undefined in persistence.xml which will use the platforms default data source. We allow you to point that anywhere. However, that limits you to one, so not really a complete solution.
>
> A more complete solution is to use a common global name, and define an alias to your deployment in our naming subsystem like so:
>
> <bindings>
>   <lookup name="java:global/env/FooDS" lookup="java:jboss/datasources/ExampleDS"/>
> </bindings>
>

Actually don’t waste your time on this alias option. PeristenceUnitServiceHandler’s approach to names will prevent it from working.



Jason T. Greene
WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat




--
Hälsningar,
Martin Andersson
Purple Scout AB
+46 732 05 14 01