On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 6:12 AM, David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd@redhat.com> wrote:
I like approach 3, assuming that it'll move in to e.g. GitHub.  If
there's an update to a doc, it's a lot easier to backport using git than
Confluence.  Less chance of old docs getting abandoned, and easier for
users to contribute fixes and updates if they can just open a PR for
each affected version.  We're already reasonably well-trained to deal
with old branches.

I don't know how we'd organize it though; I've never done multi-document
things using asciidoc, and also we'd have to publish it somehow
(preferably in an automated manner).

Actually it does look like there is an include:: option. My guess though is the reason there's a lot of combining asciidoc with awestruct is to build these multi-page sites.

[1]: http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/userguide.html#X63
 


--
- DML
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev



--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat