Sounds good to me.

Stuart


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:39 PM, David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd@redhat.com> wrote:
I think we need to look into a small redesign of how we handle
java:comp, java:module, and java:app.  The reasoning comes in three parts:

* Various specs require that certain names be bound globally across all
of java:comp.
* Various other specs implicitly expect to be able to query these
globally bound names even if there is no actual component context.
* Duplicating these bindings uses more resources than are necessary.

Therefore I think we need to make a small change - we should have a
"global" version of the three context-specific namespaces that act as a
sort of fallback if there's no (component|module|app)-specific name
bound at a location.  This allows us to do a few things:

* Satisfy the spec issues
* Reduce resource overhead
* Allow globally-configured things in the management config to bind to
component/module/app-specific namespaces

Thoughts?
--
- DML
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev