On 7/1/2014 9:33 AM, Bill Burke wrote:Resteasy got pulled in as well. Maybe that was an error on my part?
> On 7/1/2014 8:48 AM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>> On 7/1/2014 8:32 AM, Tomaž Cerar wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Vaclav Tunka <firstname.lastname@example.org
>>> <mailto:email@example.com>> wrote:
>>> My impression is Keycloak does not belong into the categories
>>> above, but maybe I don't know all the details.
>>> You don't have all details, but your reasoning is completely sound.
>>> Idea is to have keycloak auth mechanism as an option to have SSO for
>>> admin console.
>>> But that doesn't mean it needs all those dependencies in the core.
>>> We need to distinguish between, auth mechanism that should go to
>>> and keycloak subsystem which is completely different beast and should
>>> go to probably full distro.
>> We don't necessarily need the keycloak subsystem in order to use
>> keycloak for authenticating domain-http. But keycloak subsystem is not
>> the thing that pulls in all the dependencies. It's the keycloak adapter
>> that does this.
>> So if we want keycloak to authenticate domain-http out of the box then
>> we have to include all this stuff with it. That wasn't a problem before
>> the split. Almost everything it needed was already there.
> "All this stuff" is really just Apache Http Client, Jackson and
wildfly-dev mailing list