Not sure if you meant to drop the list.
But then I agree provided searching based on the ID and finding a solution written for a JBoss Web problem has the same meaning and solution within Undertow then there should be no problem re-using the ID and actually that probably should be something we do to allow an existing solution to be re-used.
Regards,
Darran Lofthouse.
On 04/07/13 11:18, Tomaž Cerar wrote:
Yes where they are reused they mean exactly same thing.
We didn't reused all messages but just in integration places that are
the same as with jbossweb.
undertow subsystem also has bunch of extra messages that are unique to it
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Darran Lofthouse<darran.lofthouse@jboss.com <mailto:darran.lofthouse@jboss.com>> wrote:<mailto:darran.lofthouse@__jboss.com
On 03/07/13 17:22, Tomaž Cerar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Darran Lofthouse
<darran.lofthouse@jboss.com <mailto:darran.lofthouse@jboss.com>
<mailto:darran.lofthouse@jboss.com>>> wrote:
Are they reporting the same problem and do they have the
same solution?
They are exactly the same, same id and msg....
That wasn't my question ;-)
Do they have the same meaning and same solution?
Or if someone searches based on these IDs is it going to mean
something different when it applies to Undertow?