On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 1:50 PM Brian Stansberry <brian.stansberry@redhat.com> wrote:
Interesting.

Why couldn't that be deployed? Doing so from the RESTEasy build probably isn't good, but a branch in https://github.com/jboss/jboss-jakarta-jaxrs-api_spec with just pom like you have seems reasonable. It's just a different way of getting the source, and is analogous to what WildFly is doing with all our ee-9/source-transform modules.

That's a good point. I hadn't thought about doing it from that repository. In that case I do think it could be done. I could submit a PR to that repository that does this.
 

On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:26 PM James Perkins <jperkins@redhat.com> wrote:
I'm not sure if this is technically allowed, but this does seem to work https://github.com/resteasy/resteasy/pull/3039. A pseudo fork so to speak.

On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:44 AM James Perkins <jperkins@redhat.com> wrote:


On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 9:39 AM Brian Stansberry <brian.stansberry@redhat.com> wrote:


On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:18 AM James Perkins <jperkins@redhat.com> wrote:
Oh sorry, my mistake :) I would guess https://github.com/jboss/jboss-jakarta-jaxrs-api_spec and each other spec likely has one there with a few exceptions. If you need access to the repository just let me know.

On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 9:12 AM Scott Stark <sstark@redhat.com> wrote:
Into which JBoss org are we forking these jakartaee and eclipse-ee4j repos is the question?

On Mar 3, 2022 at 10:58:03 AM, James Perkins <jperkins@redhat.com> wrote:
For Jakarta REST it's https://github.com/jakartaee/rest. If everyone else agrees with doing this I'm happy to get a full list together for the ones in question. If we want to just test with one first though I'm happy to have RESTEasy be the tester.

I added a column to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ql5hpsqs5ZjawErhyVQX8idigFfm0uZZxv8iys9YOGA/edit#gid=0.  Let's track data there. If people want write access please ping me with the google account to use.

I don't think we should do these unless the people driving our integration of a spec ask. We shouldn't spend time producing forks/releases if there won't be much benefit.

I guess "benefit" is somewhat relative. There is definitely a cost to using the forked version. It requires the time to handle it and brings the question of "how often do we rebase?". What RESTEasy is doing does work. However, as I said it's polluting the local repository of anyone that builds RESTEasy's main branch.

One option I've thought of, but haven't tested, was to see if there is a way with the maven-scm-plugin and the org.codehaus.mojo plugin to create a fork during the build. I can have a look at this as it seems easier at least than fully forking a repository. We wouldn't deploy these artifacts into Nexus, but they could at least be used for local testing without polluting the local repository.
 


On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 8:54 AM Scott Stark <sstark@redhat.com> wrote:
I can take it on since this impacts our getting WildFly certified for EE10. What GitHub org would I use for these forked repos?



--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list -- wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wildfly-dev-leave@lists.jboss.org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s


--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Architect, Red Hat JBoss EAP
He/Him/His


--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat


--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat


--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Architect, Red Hat JBoss EAP
He/Him/His


--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat