7:50 p.m.
Hello,
Not sure if this is the right mailing list to post the question. Does
Wildfly support Apache Portable Runtime? I've found some old discussions
about configuring APR in JBoss Web/JBoss EAP that go a few years back, but
nothing as far as Wildfly/APR support goes. A reference to a section in
the documentation explicitly stating that such and such technology is not
supported is really what I am after.
Regards,
--Peter
1:48 a.m.
APR was required to use the native connectors in JBoss Web. It is not
required when using Undertow.
Stuart
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Peter Nalyvayko <brat000012001(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
Not sure if this is the right mailing list to post the question. Does
Wildfly support Apache Portable Runtime? I've found some old discussions
about configuring APR in JBoss Web/JBoss EAP that go a few years back, but
nothing as far as Wildfly/APR support goes. A reference to a section in
the documentation explicitly stating that such and such technology is not
supported is really what I am after.
Regards,
--Peter
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
5:19 p.m.
Also, we don't recommend using the native connections anymore. Since EAP
6.1, we have had an NIO2 based connector that is better than the native
connector, and with EAP 7 we have Undertow (no need to have anything else).
Andy
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
APR was required to use the native connectors in JBoss Web. It is
not
required when using Undertow.
Stuart
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Peter Nalyvayko <brat000012001(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Not sure if this is the right mailing list to post the question. Does
> Wildfly support Apache Portable Runtime? I've found some old discussions
> about configuring APR in JBoss Web/JBoss EAP that go a few years back, but
> nothing as far as Wildfly/APR support goes. A reference to a section in
> the documentation explicitly stating that such and such technology is not
> supported is really what I am after.
>
> Regards,
> --Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
Andrig (Andy) T. Miller
Global Platform Director, Middleware
Red Hat, Inc.
4:52 a.m.
Hi Andy,
Thanks for clarifying. Is there off chance a document or a chart with
performance metrics comparing NIO in Undertow vs native connectors with
respect to SSL?
Regards,
Peter
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Andrig Miller <anmiller(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Also, we don't recommend using the native connections anymore.
Since EAP
6.1, we have had an NIO2 based connector that is better than the native
connector, and with EAP 7 we have Undertow (no need to have anything else).
Andy
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com
> wrote:
> APR was required to use the native connectors in JBoss Web. It is not
> required when using Undertow.
>
> Stuart
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Peter Nalyvayko <brat000012001(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Not sure if this is the right mailing list to post the question. Does
>> Wildfly support Apache Portable Runtime? I've found some old discussions
>> about configuring APR in JBoss Web/JBoss EAP that go a few years back, but
>> nothing as far as Wildfly/APR support goes. A reference to a section in
>> the documentation explicitly stating that such and such technology is not
>> supported is really what I am after.
>>
>> Regards,
>> --Peter
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
--
Andrig (Andy) T. Miller
Global Platform Director, Middleware
Red Hat, Inc.
5:19 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Peter Nalyvayko <brat000012001(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Andy,
Thanks for clarifying. Is there off chance a document or a chart with
performance metrics comparing NIO in Undertow vs native connectors with
respect to SSL?
Regards,
Peter
In terms of Undertow and SSL, we have not done specific tests for that,
but you don't have to use a native connector to get OpenSSL native code for
SSL in Undertow, if my memory serves me correctly.
Andy
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Andrig Miller <anmiller(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Also, we don't recommend using the native connections anymore. Since EAP
> 6.1, we have had an NIO2 based connector that is better than the native
> connector, and with EAP 7 we have Undertow (no need to have anything else).
>
> Andy
>
> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Stuart Douglas <
> stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> APR was required to use the native connectors in JBoss Web. It is not
>> required when using Undertow.
>>
>> Stuart
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Peter Nalyvayko <brat000012001(a)gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Not sure if this is the right mailing list to post the question. Does
>>> Wildfly support Apache Portable Runtime? I've found some old discussions
>>> about configuring APR in JBoss Web/JBoss EAP that go a few years back, but
>>> nothing as far as Wildfly/APR support goes. A reference to a section in
>>> the documentation explicitly stating that such and such technology is not
>>> supported is really what I am after.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --Peter
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wildfly-dev mailing list
>> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrig (Andy) T. Miller
> Global Platform Director, Middleware
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
--
Andrig (Andy) T. Miller
Global Platform Director, Middleware
Red Hat, Inc.
7:39 p.m.
Right, even with SSL, the socket is managed using NIO. The difference is just that
undertow utilizes the SSLEngine API, to provide the TLS crypto functionality. By default
the SSLEngine impl utilized is the one provided by the JDK, but Undertow does allow for
any alternative SSLEngine provider to be used instead. An example of one is the
wildfly-openssl project which provides a generic SSLEngine implementation that delegates
to your platform’s (or your custom) openssl library.
This allows us to have a minimal native dependency chain, as well as consistent
configuration values.
On Mar 8, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Andrig Miller
<anmiller(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Peter Nalyvayko <brat000012001(a)gmail.com
<mailto:brat000012001@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Andy,
Thanks for clarifying. Is there off chance a document or a chart with performance metrics
comparing NIO in Undertow vs native connectors with respect to SSL?
Regards,
Peter
In terms of Undertow and SSL, we have not done specific tests for that, but you
don't have to use a native connector to get OpenSSL native code for SSL in Undertow,
if my memory serves me correctly.
Andy
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Andrig Miller <anmiller(a)redhat.com
<mailto:anmiller@redhat.com>> wrote:
Also, we don't recommend using the native connections anymore. Since EAP 6.1, we
have had an NIO2 based connector that is better than the native connector, and with EAP 7
we have Undertow (no need to have anything else).
Andy
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com
<mailto:stuart.w.douglas@gmail.com>> wrote:
APR was required to use the native connectors in JBoss Web. It is not required when using
Undertow.
Stuart
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Peter Nalyvayko <brat000012001(a)gmail.com
<mailto:brat000012001@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Not sure if this is the right mailing list to post the question. Does Wildfly support
Apache Portable Runtime? I've found some old discussions about configuring APR in
JBoss Web/JBoss EAP that go a few years back, but nothing as far as Wildfly/APR support
goes. A reference to a section in the documentation explicitly stating that such and such
technology is not supported is really what I am after.
Regards,
--Peter
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev>
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:wildfly-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev>
--
Andrig (Andy) T. Miller
Global Platform Director, Middleware
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Andrig (Andy) T. Miller
Global Platform Director, Middleware
Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
Jason T. Greene
WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
2599
days inactive
2602
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Andrig Miller -
Jason Greene -
Peter Nalyvayko -
Stuart Douglas