Steve,
I don't have your address, so just sending to the list.
In addition to Brad's reply:
You probably used what we call Windup-legacy, which could be useful for
your current task.
Then there is Windup 2.0, currently under development.
Sparse information at
https://github.com/windup/windup/wiki/ .
To advance the state of the art, for now we would be glad if you
collected notes about what and how was migrated, so we can capture it in
the automated rules when Windup 2.0 gets released.
Regards,
Ondra
On 10.8.2014 00:41, Brad Davis wrote:
We are happy to look at your stack trace and solving that if you
would
rather. Otherwise, if you want to DEVELOP windup, check out the
source, solve the stack trace, and send a pull request.
Brad Davis
Red Hat Consulting
Email: bdavis(a)redhat.com <mailto:bdavis@redhat.com> | c:980.226.7865
<tel:980.226.7865> |http://www.redhat.com <
http://www.redhat.com/>
On Aug 9, 2014, at 6:07 PM, windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:windup-dev@lists.jboss.org> wrote:
> Windup sounds like a perfect fit for exactly the job I have to do -
> we're porting a WebLogic application to JBoss.
>
> I know next to nothing about this application - I didn't develop any
> part of it, although I am newly part of a team that developed it.
>
> I downloaded the binary downloadable from the site to try it out and
> it quickly crapped out on our source code. NullPointerException. Oh
> well.
>
> I then followed the instructions to Build windup and after some
> difficulty, got the build to work. (Maven 3.1 required? guess I was
> behind the times, but okay).
> It built a whole bunch of stuff, none of which looks anything like
> the downloadable package.
>
> I don't want to DEVELOP windup, but I understand open source and
> don't mind doing my part to advance the state of the art. But where
> to start? There's no easily findable documentation telling me what,
> in this massive directory tree I've built, to do if I want to USE
> windup, and that's what I need now.
>
> Can someone please point me at this information?
>
> Or would my team be better off forgetting about windup and slogging
> through the port the old-fashioned way? I'd like to use windup but I
> need some initial guidance.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> Posted by forums
> Original post:
https://community.jboss.org/message/884033#884033
>
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:windup-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev