+1.
Brad Davis
Red Hat Consulting
Email: bdavis(a)redhat.com | c: 980.226.7865 |
http://www.redhat.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lincoln Baxter, III" <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com>
To: "Windup-dev List" <windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 9:55:16 AM
Subject: Re: [windup-dev] Let's use relative paths
I agree that relative paths are a good idea. +1
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Ondrej Zizka < ozizka(a)redhat.com > wrote:
Hi,
I suggest we use relative paths.
For the reports, using full paths may get overly verbose and make the
reports unreadable.
Relative paths are usually not, that much.
Compare e.g.:
INFO: Unzipping
/home/ondra/work/Migration/Windup/tests/core/target/../../../test-files/Windup1x-javaee-example.war
to
/home/ondra/work/Migration/Windup/tests/core/target/windupreport/archives/Windup1x-javaee-example.war
vs.
INFO: Unzipping ../../../test-files/Windup1x-javaee-example.war to
windupreport/archives/Windup1x-javaee-example.war
The base path may be stated just once somewhere else.
From my experience, using relative paths may get tricky, needing to
carry the base path(s) along with the relative, but still, is worth the
work.
my2c,
Ondra
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev