On a related note, would it be acceptable not to create JIRAs for small
changes like typos or changes in wording of messages? That clutters the
jira and inflates the volume of items to review regularly. Could just a
PR be enough?
Ondra
On 16.1.2015 05:11, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
Hey Team,
Just wanted to let you know that I did some (quite a bit of) JIRA
cleanup. I've close a lot of old issues that hadn't seen any progress
in a long time. That's not to say that they can't be reopened if we
want to implement one, but I wanted to reduce the noise in JIRA and
make it easier to find things.
Additionally, I probably closed about 30 issues that were already
completed. So let's try (as I mentioned in my other email) to do a
better job with closing issues when they are completed.
I'm going to be continuing to sort issues into the 2.0.0.Final version
tag so that we can focus on getting this release out. I know I missed
a few things that people are currently working on, but I'll get to it,
or remind me and I'll put it in (or tag it yourselves.)
Cheers!
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev