I'm fine with calling them tags. I think how this is used will ultimately determine what they are called. What do the others think?

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka@redhat.com> wrote:
I started working on selection. WINDUP-523

Multi-categories PR works (tests passed). https://github.com/windup/windup/pull/485

WRT metadata API, I suggest it simply copies the structure of the proposed XML at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1F07dzjkAwupZ7-FusBP6OQXDkQzwwKqnqL7gEvw7nrc/edit#heading=h.rcjo3iqrs8g8
Note that I don't mean copying in terms of data classes, only the API, and take the "Javascript prototypal inheritance" approach - bubble up through Rule, RuleProvider, Ruleset, [user defaults, Windup defaults?] until a value is found.

One note on possible necessity for a hashmap of random uncontrolled values of unknown type: If there's such need, how about simply putting it inside of the metadata - i.e.  .getMetadata().getCustomData() or such?

Lastly, are we going to stay with "category" or change the naming to tags? I would prefer tags - it's more general and I think users will use this feature to more than just categories.

Ondra





On 3.3.2015 21:04, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
I checked the project calendar and we are on schedule for a 17/Mar/2015 release of 2.2.0.Final

The primary goal of this release (among other things), is enablement of rule-set storage, categorization, and selection.

More updates tomorrow during the weekly meeting.

--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."


_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev


_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev



--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."