Agreed. I think we should create a new schema for this. We really don't want this to be in the rules schema itself (that would add a lot of potential confusion to rule-authors who are just getting started.) E.g. We don't actually test the rules automatically in Windup, it's really just part of our build at the moment.

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Marek Novotny <mnovotny@redhat.com> wrote:

fyi I created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WINDUP-710 for that.

On 5.8.2015 16:03, Jess Sightler wrote:
> It doesn't have a schema because noone has had the time to write one yet.
>
> I would suggest adding it to a new schema rather than including it in
> the main one. I think the elements here are sufficiently different from
> the ones used in the rules themselves to warrant their own schema.
>
> On 08/05/2015 07:40 AM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>> Hi Windup devs,
>>
>> while creating more windup rule tests in xml files I get more and more
>> annoyed by wrong XSD in ruletest elements.
>>
>> Something we have like
>> <ruletest xmlns="http://windup.jboss.org/schema/jboss-ruleset">
>>
>> There is no ruletest element definition in that XSD.
>>
>> I think we need to create new XSD just for ruletest or to add that
>> element into our schema at
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/windup/windup/master/config-xml/schema/windup-jboss-ruleset.xsd
>>
>>
>>
>> What do you prefer and why?
>>
>

--
Marek Novotny
--
WFK and Seam Product Lead

Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
Purkynova 99
612 45 Brno

_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev

Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."