Re: [windup-dev] RuleModel et al.
Oh, I see... if we are going to do this, I could see it having a few things:
1. RuleID - A string uniquely identifying the rule
2. Rule Version - The version of the addon containing the rule
3. RulePhase - The phase during which the rule was run
I don't think that this belongs in reporting, though. I am also not sure
how easy it would be to automate the population of these fields, though
it might be possible with some tweaks to frames.
On 07/21/2014 08:59 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
So far, an ID and a reference to the Ruleset. The ruleset then would
probably have further info, like, version etc.
https://github.com/OndraZizka/windup/blob/3940b146f811ab6e5fff1cb6c6def71...
Anyway, even if it was just an ID, OOP principles suggest to encapsulate
that ID to a type. My experience agrees. I may be wrong though.
Ondra
On 22.7.2014 02:40, Jess Sightler wrote:
> I'm not opposed to this idea... except that I don't know what a
> "RuleModel" would actually contain, other than the ID.
>
> What are you proposing it to contain?
>
> On 07/21/2014 07:03 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
>> We should have $subj:
>>
>> We need to refer to the rules in the report.
>> We agreed to store all information in the graph.
>> Current ID is not guaranteed to be the same over runs.
>> Current ID has no namespaces.
>>
>> my2c.
>> Ondra
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> windup-dev mailing list
>> windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev