Yes. That was the entire point of this move after all. :)
On 05/04/2016 03:55 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
Could this be outside windup/windup repo? It makes the build take
longer.
Ondra
On 29.4.2016 15:30, Jess Sightler wrote:
> Sort of. The code is all directly from the upstream repo (with history).
> The pom is a slightly modified version of the one we have in
> windup/forks/fernflower.
>
> On 04/29/2016 03:58 AM, Marek Novotny wrote:
>> Just to confirm for myself, that is based on what we have here
>>
https://github.com/windup/windup/tree/master/forks/fernflower, right?
>>
>> On 28.4.2016 23:23, Jess Sightler wrote:
>>> I have created a new project within Windup for maintaining a fork of
>>> Fernflower with Java 7 compatibility and a Maven pom. Maybe we can start
>>> releasing and keeping this up to date separately from windup core?
>>>
>>> It is here:
>>>
https://github.com/windup/windup-fernflower
>>>
>>> I think we can switch Windup to use this as part of 2.6.0, if noone
>>> objects to that.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> windup-dev mailing list
>>> windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev