Re: [windup-dev] Windup legacy rules rewriting
I do remember this discussion, and I think that while it's one possible
solution, it's not really beneficial to have the separated out into
non-java files. In this particular scenario, I do think that writing
multiple rules is probably not what we want, but we do probably want to
keep the data in Java, in the ConfigurationProvider or a closely related
class.
Matej was just doing what he thought we asked him to do, literally port the
rules 1:1. He now understands we meant "port the functionality." :)
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
just a note on $SUBJ. I may be wrong, but I recall we agreed that the
old rules, since being so monotonous, could have one rule, which would
load the simple data from a static file(s), and one rule which would
execute them. E.g. a simple .csv file with regex, hint, reference. Or
JSON/XML if needed.
Now Matej creates one java rule per each legacy regex.
Is there some change in the previous plan?
Both solutions have obvious advantages, I just want to know what was the
decision.
Thanks,
Ondra
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.9 KB)