There's already no need to use Iteration.over() anymore. It's implicit if the operation passed in is an AbstractIterationOperation. We improved this a few months ago :)

For example: https://github.com/windup/windup/blob/master/rules-java/src/main/java/org/jboss/windup/rules/apps/java/scan/provider/IndexClassFilesRuleProvider.java#L47


	public Configuration getConfiguration(GraphContext context)
	{
	return ConfigurationBuilder.begin()
	.addRule()
	.when(Query.fromType(FileModel.class)
	.withProperty(FileModel.IS_DIRECTORY, false)
	.withProperty(FileModel.FILE_PATH, QueryPropertyComparisonType.REGEX, ".*\\.class")
	)
	.perform(
	new AddClassFileMetadata()
	.and(Commit.every(10))
	.and(IterationProgress.monitoring("Indexed class file: ", 1000))
	);
	}

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi all,

could this

.addRule()
.when(Query.fromType(ArchiveModel.class))
.perform(Iteration.over(ArchiveModel.class)
.perform(new AbstractIterationOperation<ArchiveModel>()
{
@Override
public void perform(GraphRewrite event,
EvaluationContext evCtx, ArchiveModel arch)
{

be just

.addRule()
.perform(new IterationOver(ArchiveModel.class) {
@Override
public void perform(GraphRewrite event,
EvaluationContext evCtx, ArchiveModel arch)
{

?
If it can ( a. principially, b. nobody objects), I could try coding it.

Thanks,
Ondra
_______________________________________________
windup-dev mailing list
windup-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev

Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."