Re: [windup-dev] Windup terminology question
On 18 Sep 2014, at 21:40, Sande Gilda <sgilda(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/18/2014 03:58 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2014, at 19:56, Sande Gilda <sgilda(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Ondra and I have created a glossary on the Windup Wiki to document terminology
that is used by Windup. The goal is to finalize the correct terms we want to use in Windup
and avoid confusion down the road.
>>
>> One of the open issues is whether to describe a "ruleset" (formerly
referred to as "rulebase") as a "Forge add-on" or as a "Windup
plug-in". Does anyone have a preference?
> I prefer “ruleset” ;-) IOW I don’t think either those are the right description.
We already decided on ruleset over rulebase, so I'm glad you agree.
How should we describe a ruleset? Won't customers be able to create their own?
I would describe a ruleset as a ruleset, or perhaps a “collection rules packaged as a
JAR”?
>> The glossary page is located here:
https://github.com/windup/windup/wiki/Glossary. As you come across other Windup terms,
feel free to update the page directly or email/ping me so that we include them on that
page.
>>
>> Robb, I included some terms from your presentation and took an educated guess at
the meanings. Please let me know if they are incorrect.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sande
>>